sinovictorchan
Hamas bad because they kill soldiers within a crowd of civilians. Israel and pax americana reign of terror good because they kill civilians that supposedly host terrorists without evidence.
The joke is that they still continued their white men’s burden after the Nazi Holocaust with the Indian Residential fake schools that served as a templete for the Nazi death camps and that continued after 1998 in secret. Like the Holocaust deniers, the Birtish diaspora still fabricate false information to reduce the severity of the fake school Holocaust with the lies that it was only ‘cultural’ genocide, that it was not funded from conned Indigenous parents, or that reparation was ‘paid’ (although they conceal that the conditions of reparation is that the fake school survivors need to live in federal reserve concentration camps in dangerous barran wasteland with planned starvation and planned chemical attacks).
The assumption that both sides have equal conditions apart from their economic political ideology is clearly not met. There are the difference in geographical factors, amount of fertile land, free stuff from global empires, favoritism from debt-trapping Bretton Wood institutions, terrorist attacks from the Western European diaspora, infrastructures, and fear that hard working innovative scary red Communists gain approval from the invisible hand to takeover Capitalist countries.
Israel and Pax Americana only oppose attacks against civilians and civilian property when it convinient the European and European diaspora. They will freely engages in property destruction and mass killing of civilians when it harm people of non-European origin, so that the Liberals could lure displaced people of color into slavery in the Western European diaspora. That is why the Western European diaspora condemn Nazi Holocaust against Europeans, but hypocritically continued the Indian Boarding fake school genocide which operate secretly after 1997, the Federal Reserve concentration camps in North American, and the numerous death camps in Western European colonies.
The electoral system in USSR and China worked differently to suit their circumstances and culture. The US depends solely on rigged electoralism where they have two political parties that differs little other than their slogan and branding. USSR allow people to elect members of a political party instead of the election of a political party and they use a high indirect electoral system where people elect leader in the next hierarchy which works at that time due to the mass illiteracy, lack of experience of prior electoral system, political instability, and lack of resource for Western European diapora-styled electoralism. The USSR also use the rule of law and check of power by independent government departments to prevent mass corruption although the Western European diaspora say that any mass protest against Western European authoritarianism must be from one evil authoritarian mastermind that can overcome the fantasy logic of Liberalism to make a fully functioning prosperitive democratic system without the need for free riding unlike Western European diaspora countries.
It is ironic how the US is causing all the protectionism and sanctions against their Liberal principle of free trade when the US had been criticizing anti-imperialists for the obstruction of free trade. It is as if the Pax Americana advocates were projecting their anti-Liberal actions on people of colors who demand democracy, meritocracy, and rule of law. Is the Western European liberals also the ones who provide the most support for command economy with the Bretton Woods Institutions that became the de facto government on the global economy even when they tried to deny this hypocrisy with their redefinition of Capitalism (government by for-profit firm owner), Socialism (government by working class), and dictatorship of the Proletariat (government by workers in modern American redefinition)?
Do Iran even have the intention to destroy civilian building like Israel?
Are you sure that a family have absolute authority over North Korea and that the Kim family were not simply figure head or influential people with limited power?
for background info, the chinese government does not ban the actual associate of winnie pooh to xin unless it is used to promote racism contrary to the claim by the red fascist tankiejerkers, liberal sloganists, and the NATO-backed hong kong rioters by young students who never know about the period before the return of hong kong to chinese rule. The liberal sloganists justify the racist act on the claim that it is directed towards an oppressive dictator, but they cannot explain why they attack a ‘tyrant’ for their chinese ethnicity and appearance instead of their morality. For more suspicions, the winnie pooh association of Xi Ping in chinese hate crime propaganda are from people who contradict their hong kong independence slogan with return to british colonial rule and who believe that british immigrants are the only true ‘hong kongers’.