Need a hot feminist take need a hot feminist take. Oh I know
“A woman could never write Finnegans Wake or Ulysses”
Is it better do you think to read the notes beforehand so I know what I’m getting into, or afterwards to contextualize what I read? Or maybe both? Probably both is best for me lol.
I’d read a section of Ulysses, the relevant annotations, and then I’d reread the section of Ulysses. Other strategies may vary, and of course I already knew that if I wanted to read the book I wouldn’t mind reading it twice. The first two sections of Ulysses are perfectly comprehensible - it’s when you get to “Ineluctable modality of the visible” that a lot of people give up. (Stephen Dedalus walking down the beach thinking about Aristotle.) So maybe you can do the first fifty pages or so and see how far you want to take it.
Ineluctable modality
Fuck I don’t even know what those words mean without context much less in a sentence :ohnoes:
This is good advice though, I’m bad at reading and would need a strategy.
Here’s Burgess, ReJoyce, page 22:
The thing to do is to forget that the field of the novel is as limited as the cult of the contemporary best-seller is making it, and to consider that Joyce may be within his rights in turning language into one of the characters of Ulysses (perhaps in Finnegans Wake the only character). In Ulysses, the poeticising and the pastiche and parody serve, as we shall see later, a dramatic enough purpose; they also deepen the human characters by adding to their ordinary human dimensions the dimension first, of history, then of myth.
