Big horse-fucking discourse, apparently. Vegan debate nerds demand formal logical proofs before accepting that horse-fucking is bad.

Abolish debate club.

Unpictured (note: this person is a lib): Never thought I’d live to see the day where some lefties would be making biological essentialist arguments in regards to veganism.

Tweets in image:

https://twitter.com/OMN1SAM/status/1402853387339812864?s=19

https://twitter.com/OMN1SAM/status/1402858057290354688?s=19

https://twitter.com/OMN1SAM/status/1402858260630212609?s=19

Their first foray, before they corncobbed live on the TL: https://twitter.com/OMN1SAM/status/1402665321073315840?s=19

Where it began; or, horse-fucker zero: https://twitter.com/ChadNotChud/status/1402010588318928902?s=19

I discovered this just now and it brightened my morning and I wanted to share. It’s rare to see such a pure little meltdown in the wild like this, especially after May!

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

They keep interrogating exactly that obviously correct answer, which is what I’m making fun of.

It’s a weird argument to choose to make, in a universe of so many other arguments, one could simply not make the horse fucking argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

They’re trying to do the Socratic method by imploring people to examine why they’re against one but not the other, hoping to make them realize that they hold contradictory values and thus nudging them towards veganism.

It can be an effective argument, but of course this is Twitter so any interaction is going to turn to shit because the platform is inherently hostile to productive discussions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

But it’s not going to be an effective argument because it goes straight for the jugular that eating meat is morally equivalent to horse fucking. Most people are going to be instantly pissed off and leave the conversation, or get angry and leave a shitty reply.

It’s the same shit edgy internet atheists do by instantly saying that religious people worship a genocidal monster or whatever. It’s not a good argument. These people also say they’re using the socratic method to cover for being an asshole. Not every edgy internet argument or equivalence is “the socratic method”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

These are good points to remember. No one cares about how technically correct your argument is – if it sounds silly, invites ridicule, or even just annoys your target audience, you aren’t going to accomplish very much.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Once more with feeling: ABOLISH DEBATE CLUB

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

I agree with that, debate club sucks because it frames a discussion as a game one can win, instead of a tool one uses to achieve understanding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments