“We are going to allow women to work and study. We have got frameworks, of course. Women are going to be very active in the society but within the framework of Islam,” Zabihullah Mujahid, the group’s spokesman, said at a press conference in Kabul on Tuesday.

Mujahid, who had been a shadowy figure for years, said that “there will be no discrimination against women” adding that “they are going to work shoulder to shoulder with us.”

Pressed on how the new Taliban government will differ from the previous one, Mujahid said that the group has evolved and will not take the same actions they did in the past.

“There will be a difference when it comes to the actions we are going to take” compared with 20 years ago, he said.

“We are committed to the media within our cultural frameworks. Private media can continue to be free and independent. They can continue their activities,” he said.

He also said the group has no plans to enter the homes of people or carry out retaliatory attacks on anyone who served in the previous governments, worked with foreigners or were part of the Afghan National Security Forces.

There have been unconfirmed reports of Taliban fighters entering the homes of Kabul residents, but Mujahid said those were impostors who should be turned over to the Taliban and face appropriate punishment

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

There is absolutely no reason to have any faith in this

If you recall, my first comment that you responded to began with the words “No faith in it.”

That said, I wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out that corporate media exaggerated/selectively emphasized/misrepresented facts about an enemy of the United States. It’s happened in literally every other war we’ve fought, without exception, so really we’re asking to what degree the facts have been twisted. Further, even fundamentalist religious nuts are not static in their beliefs. In the past 20 years Saudi Arabia and Iran have (lightly) loosened restrictions on women – is it so far fetched to believe that another fundamentalist Muslim group could do the same? And of course you have the material reality of the situation, which is that a new government (that’s already had assets frozen by the U.S., and knows without a doubt it will be the target of endless imperial harassment at best) is trying to maintain stability and legitimacy. Simply as a practical matter, you now have women in positions where immediately cutting them out would cause problems. You also have a generation of people who have grown up in a country where women had a lot more freedom than they had in the 1990s – how much of that toothpaste can be put back in the tube, and how high of priority is that over stability and legitimacy?

They’re probably not going to follow through on this, but some modest improvements from the 90s are certainly possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In the past 20 years Saudi Arabia and Iran have (lightly) loosened restrictions on women – is it so far fetched to believe that another fundamentalist Muslim group could do the same?

Yes, because at least in the case of Iran and Saudi Arabia there has been a greater deal of communication with the rest of the world and a longer period of stability and material improvement. Actually I wouldn’t even really say that for Saudi Arabia, and Iran was always better than the Taliban in that regard. This has not been allowed to happen in Afghanistan and particularly for the Taliban. There is nothing exaggerated about the Taliban, it is very hard to exaggerate something like that. Just ask the refugees leaving the place in droves trying to get to Turkey and Europe. We’ve had a lot of them here and I’m sure we’ll have more now.

As a practical matter yes, I think there will be some improvement compared to the 90s, but I don’t believe they have changed in their beliefs.

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 198

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments