If he had stuck strictly to cops, we’d be all good, but one of the first people he murdered wasn’t one.
Going after the families of bad people when they really didn’t play any role in the bad person’s actions is abhorrent and indefensible. Kids shouldn’t have to pay for the sins of the father and all that.
It doesn’t completely invalidate the good he did do/say, but it’s definitely a black mark on his record and why I can’t really get fully behind him, even for meme reasons.
I’ve brought him up before, but I think Micah Xavier Johnson is overall a better example. Apparently he was a sexual harasser when he was in the military, which is obviously terrible, but at least you can say when he went on his spree that he didn’t go for any non-cops.
Dude, stop trying to justify it, it’s fucking gross.
It’s no better than Trump saying “We have to kill the terrorists and their families.”
Automatic guilt by association is bullshit. Dorner’s victim did literally nothing wrong.
She was engaged to a school cop (gross) and was having her dad to pull strings to try and get her fiancee a job on the force as a real cop. That sounds lot like a collaborator to me, than a victim who did “literally nothing” wrong. I am not saying Dorner was justified to do what he did, but she was no angel.
Does that mean she deserved to die? I don’t care about if she was perfect or not. No one is perfect.
