and then answered with China.

:amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap: :amerikkka-clap:

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
24 points

Considering that China isn’t founded on settler colonialism, genocide, and chattel slavery, I’d say Chinese nationalism is inevitable gonna be less toxic than US nationalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply

All nationalism is toxic, don’t fool yourself

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I could say “Read Lenin”. Instead, I’m going to ask - do you think national liberation movements to throw off the yoke of imperialism are bad?

permalink
report
parent
reply

China is a sovereign entity, if you have that jingoistic pride bullshit going on after you become independant and a major power player in the world then yes, it is bad to be nationalistic

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Liberation is good. Nationalism as a tool to accomplish it is a double-edged sword.

permalink
report
parent
reply