Permanently Deleted

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
59 points
*

I love this article it’s so mask off and radicalizing.

They correctly identify the situation: It’s only the West that hates Russia (Anglo nations/EU/Japan). The rest of the world supports Russia or is indifferent, and just wants this sanctions war to end so they can afford to live.

But the conclusion they draw from that is insane: we were too compassionate and anti-colonialist before. We need to rid ourselves of any empathy for the global poor and push to steal more from them than ever before. Doing otherwise and going easy on them is “soft racism”. It’s actually the anti-colonialists who are the real racists. Let them all starve for supporting Putin!

Instead of questioning themselves and doing introspection to why they are on the opposing side as the global poor and colonized, they instead double down. Do we lift the sanctions, allow our Ukrainian proxy to surrender & help alleviate the global food crisis urgently? No. We sanction those ungrateful little nations for being disobedient, we let those Putinists starve & we fight to the last Ukrainian. Their egos are going to get us all killed, they are starting to see how crazy this is but they can’t back down now

permalink
report
reply
11 points
*

Liberals will never come out and say “Only good white Europeans are capable of building civilization and that is why we must rule the world,” but that’s the hole in the middle of everything they’re willing to express out loud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

They have basically come out and said it in this article. Financial Times is news for bourgeois, they tend to have correct assessments and completely wrong conclusions. In other words, Marxian analysis but from the perspective of the bourgeois.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They’ve always pretty much said this. Throughout history, “liberals” have been some of the most unrepentant imperialists in the name of “saving” people from their inferior superstitions with the light of Enlightenment values.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Depends on the lib in question, I suppose. I’ve known a lot (usually the type to loudly complain about “tankies”) who will talk about how bad it is that there are still colonialist themes in western entertainment and then, in the next breath, proclaim that Western hegemony must be maintained to oppose evil China and Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments