idk, but let’s base our entire system of living on a small cabal of geriatric white guys trying to interpret poorly written shit like this!

seriously, this is such a good microcosm of constitutional law and jurisprudence.

It’s worded awkwardly but theyre saying there’s no precedence in our history for a right to transition and therefore you’re not entitled to have it now.

here

“there is no right to transition, and that distinct lack of a right is part of our deeply rooted tradition”

it’s incoherent because LACK of something is not tradition, unless you count the long bloody history of minority enslavement and persecution as “tradition”

What they are attempting to say is because trans people “didnt exist” in the past and the right to trans care wasn’t mentioned in the constitution, your medical care isn’t protected.