being furry is an aesthetic, for many of us it could represent an important or large part of our lives, but it is not the same. This is a bad take
i never said it was “the same.”
i pointed out the absolutely inane usage of chud talking points that equate any form of lgbtq as being a mental illness that is intrinsically abusive and bad for everyone involved.
which is absolutely what the above argument is.
They didn’t say that being a furry makes you abusive, just that the way the community exists creates a potential for abuse.
Idunno. Either way, since you’re not equating the two experiences
“the potential for abuse is something to watch out for, so lets make sure the community is the best it can be” isnt what the comment was though.
the comment was “it … glorifies parasocialism and emotional disassociation” or, in other words, that the entire community is a mental illness.
which is exactly what chuds say about all lgbtq communities.
thats not okay.
