Someone watch this and lemme know how much is pure western c o p e.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

According to neoclassical theory, the answer is yes, nothing has changed, because you can still get 10 units of the same item, which is completely absurd that doesn’t pass even the slightest bit of scrutiny with common sense.

I think you need to elaborate more here to help me understand why this would be “completely absurd”. In your example, the person still has the same buying power one year later (assuming everything else is inflating at the same rate). I think I know where you’re going with it, but it’s not exactly apparent as you’ve presented here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Clearly this cannot be true because debt exists

Ah, right, I think if you stuck this in the part that I quoted, it would have done the trick is all, thanks for the reminder lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

In a way, this gives me some comfort, because it seems like Chinese leaders aren’t this short-sighted. So they can plan and maybe even beat the capitalists.

permalink
report
parent
reply

When you double the income and prices, creditors can also change the interest rates (the price of the money), and increasing the interest rate (making money more expensive) hurts the debtors and benefits the creditors, and vice versa.

I know I’m late here but wanted to ask you, are you making a distinction between existing borrowers and new borrowers? if you already got the thing with the loan - the car, the house - and it’s a fixed interest rate, then the debtor benefits from inflation because the dollars they are paying back are worth less. Is that correct? In the other example you said borrow 200 but now is only worth 100, is that for more of a “liquid” loan, revolving credit kind of thing (not sure the terms) - but the kind of loan that backs biz- industry

I appreciate all your effort-comments on this topic.

Regarding 2008 housing

Obama could have bailed out the banks AND let homeowners stay in their homes by erasing the underwater portion, but nope that would send the wrong message. We were knocked out of out home with a short sale and some rando bought it for half what we paid. Literally zero economic difference. The amount was wiped out the same as if we had stayed. “Puritanical morality” for thee but not for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah I’m also lost, if it takes me half an hour of work to buy an apple if doesn’t really matter if that’s $.10/hr and a 5¢ apple, or $100/hr and a $50 apple. I still worked half an hour.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

But if you took out a loan for $100, suddenly your loan no longer buys 2000 apples, it only buys two. And since almost every industry in the U.S. is debt financed, that has some pretty large implications as to what the worth of that debt is, how much it can be traded for, and how much can be produced off of that debt. Which means that money shouldn’t be seen as a medium of exchange in-of-itself, but actually as a transformed form of debt that is basically created out of thin air.

It’s actually a very fundamental, but counter-intuitive concept, like time being a variable that slows down as you approach the speed of light. It’s a phenomenon that happens at a macro-level of the economy that has absolutely huge consequences on the behaviors of microeconomics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

you can block their dollar transaction and there’s nothing they can do about it?

So… if I have $10m, and I use it to, uh, buy a bridge in Kenya…the US can say “no fuck off”? How does that work? Can they stop it in a way other than by pressuring Kenya to not accept it?

both scenarios are the same and nothing has changed about your financial position?

Maybe I’m being a dumdum. But…practically your situation hasn’t changed, right? If everything increases at the same rate, then only the numbers get bigger?

Unless there are things which money can buy that doesn’t increase in price. Like labour power, usually. Or when govts give big corpos $1 trillion in loans they use to buy real shit for essentially free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah crypto was only ever useful for two things: bad crimes and good crimes

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

The SWIFT system can block your transaction.

And if somehow the Chinese store the USD in their own bank and use their own transaction system, then the US will sanction them and Kenya to prevent the dollars from being used anywhere outside the two countries. At that point it’ll just be Monopoly money with the hopes of it being worth something if sanctions are lifted.

Then the US will block any companies doing business with the bank (or the entire country like Russia and Afghanistan or Cuba), any organization giving aid to Kenya, and that bank probably has a lot of customers who will be angry if they can’t access the American market. Not to mention, it’ll pressure other countries who claim to be sovereign and equal to bow down to their masters, and now China and Kenya is blocked off from the western world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments