:yea:

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments

It’s never the japanese power armor ma.k version of starship troopers either, it’s always the verhoeven version that morons don’t understand.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Verhoven picked up the novel, read about five pages and threw it out of the window. He wasn’t interested in the least in actual science fiction. And Starship Troopers the novel is definitely science fiction in the proper sense of the word. It is legit literature.

Instead, he made a “parody” movie that most people didn’t get. But hey, at least we got the unforgettable image of Doogie Howser, SS. Yay?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

It’s a generic hero story to push pro-fascist speeches and politics. Defending it here is extremely sus for a 1 hour old account.

Instead, he made a “parody” movie that most people didn’t get. But hey, at least we got the unforgettable image of Doogie Howser, SS. Yay?

Satire is dead and ineffective everyone here already knows this. Anything you satire will always just be used unironically be the fash as aspirational and reinforce them. That doesn’t change the fact that the original is a trashy generic pro-nazi book.

The book was tossed out for the satire of the movie because making the book as a movie would have been the production of fascist agitprop. Nobody really knew what we know now about satire not working.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Is Satire really pointless though? It reaches its intended audience very well.

Just because some chuds are too brain dead to realize they are being made fun of doesn’t change the fact that they are being made fun of.

The alternative is they rally around legit fascist agitprop like “day of the rope” or some nightmarish genocide fantasy - it’s not like they will waste away into dust.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Satire is dead and ineffective everyone here already knows this.

I think satire for any broader audience needs to clearly include and demonstrate the contradiction of what it’s seeking to satirize: simply showing something that’s absurd and awful and trusting people to realize it’s mocking it is bad practice, especially when its mockery is only a little exaggerated from reality. Starship Troopers is bad satire because it doesn’t refute the system it is satirizing, and it just comes across as generic corny military sci-fi with a similar fascistic tone to normal American slop if someone isn’t already aware of its goals. All the nationalism and bloodlust in it is just a clearer statement of what most American theater-goers already expected from media.

To be effective it would have had to be more overt and actively spell out what it’s implying: include a scene establishing the meteor was a natural phenomenon and the government knew it, hell establish that they decided against having asteroid-defense-systems because it would have meant raising taxes or diverting half a percent of military funding or something, and so clearly establish that the ridiculous casus belli is explicitly a lie; establish that the pointless invasion of the bug worlds is failing and the war is going poorly overall so that it doesn’t look like they’re just winning a hard fought victory against a monstrous foe; hell establish the bugs as individually smarter and more concerned with their own lives with something like a direct attack on a nest being met with a holding action from worker forms who fall back when actual soldier forms arrive and repel the attack; etc.

It basically needed to make it clear that the humans were in the wrong and the villain was the Fascist regime behind the war in the first place, and that they’re losing because they’re disorganized and launching a genocidal war against an entrenched foe over literally nothing but sheer stupid bloodlust.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

love to defend rapist fascist writing as “legit literature”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s /lit/ for you

permalink
report
parent
reply

Wasn’t the original legit full of unironic fascist admiration, though?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It was kinda piloitically incoherent libertarianism. So yeah, it is close enough to fascist to get work done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Verhoeven’s movie, like all good sci fi, is a commentary on the present disguised as a story about futury stuff.

That American’s (including me but also I was twelve) were too dense to get it isn’t Verhoeven’s fault. If anything it just demonstrates the point he’s hammering on in so many of his movies. Look at how many people unironically like Robocop, while disdaining Showgirls!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

counterpoint, the literal dumbest guy i know gets that it’s satire. not like a chud per se, but just in terms of intellect. (this anecdote doesn’t mean satire isn’t dead)

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments