I got as far as them re-litigating Joe Lieberman

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
76 points

The choices are not either drones or American boots on the ground. That’s a false dichotomy. And we ended up leaving anyway. I can only imagine how it must feel to lose a family member as a civilian casualty of a drone strike and then the occupying country just leaves.

I don’t see how these other example are relevant. Edward Snowden was not a double agent working for a foreign entity. He saw that a government agency was breaking the law and then told the American people. He also worked with a reputable news agency to not release unnecessary classified information. By all means, this should have been lauded by the Obama administration.

Just because you claim the high ground doesn’t mean you own it.

When you say shit like this its hard for people to take you seriously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The way we fight terrorists is to decapitate the head of their organization. Pretty soon No one wants to be boss anymore. They are the targets. Now you have a choice on how to eliminate those targets, either by combat or by a newish idea drones. But, both are not clean. More than bin Laden died in the house that night. You may argue they shouldn’t be killed in the first place, but I believe it was necessary.

You don’t know if Snowden wasn’t an agent by the evidence. He stole intelligence and caused it it be published then went running to Russia. I don’t think a Russian intelligence agency could ask for anything more.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The way we fight terrorists is to decapitate the head of their organization. Pretty soon No one wants to be boss anymore.

how long is “pretty soon”? 50+ years?

also, the US doesn’t so much “fight terrorists” as it trains, arms and finances them to destabilize regions near US geopolitical rivals, and then get real shocked when all that blows back on US civilians. though it does seem to work up little baby brains into shoveling more money, bones, and blood into the military industrial complex. so maybe it’s a win-win?

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

it trains, arms and finances them to destabilize regions near US geopolitical rivals

Hmm, that sounds familiar

and then get real shocked when all that blows back on US civilians.

I’m sure that definitely won’t happen though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

How do you even argue with someone who just makes up beliefs? Like, you can and do just say whatever you want and it doesn’t matter that reality doesn’t reflect that, you have your ideology that the world must conform to and you just ignore things that make it inconvenient to believe.

“The way we fight terrorists is to decapitate the head of their organization. Pretty soon No one wants to be boss anymore. They are the targets. Now you have a choice on how to eliminate those targets, either by combat or by a newish idea drones. But, both are not clean. More than bin Laden died in the house that night. You may argue they shouldn’t be killed in the first place, but I believe it was necessary.” Source on this entire paragraph? Proof “pretty soon nobody wants to be boss anymore”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

takes huge steaming dump and points to it

what’s the matter, can’t argue with that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So you dislike the message but can’t argue with it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

The way we fight terrorists is to decapitate the head of their organization

Wait, are you telling us the US Senate, White House, Pentagon, Lockheed Martin’s HQ, CIA HQ and Congress were bombed by US drones? Is Joe Biden among the dead?

Ah, you mean the arab terrorists, okay, you got me hyped up for a second there. I thought that, for once, the US would take the fight against the biggest terrorist organizations but nevermind.

You may argue they shouldn’t be killed in the first place, but I believe it was necessary.

Israel moment.

You see brother your logic makes perfect sense when you think about it: bad terrorist leader = target for our drones. The problem is that bad terrorist leader can be anywhere, and sometimes drone ends up firing a few Hellfire missiles into weddings and orphan hospitals. So what’s up with that? Who answers for these war crimes? Because so far no drone operator has been convicted for war crimes, “mistakes happen” as they say and they get away with it. And this is assuming the US fights this very loose term of “terrorism” at all, because some of these terrorists were previously armed and financed by the US itself to destabilize rival governments, kinda like how the US sent thousands of TOW anti-tank missile launchers to a bunch of sus factions in Syria because Assad bad, then these people turned out to be Al Nusra

permalink
report
parent
reply

The way we fight terrorists is to decapitate the head of their organization. Pretty soon No one wants to be boss anymore

So you’re just making shit up from video games or tv, because this is the opposite of the truth. This is the tactic the US used in Iraq and Afghanistan, it consistently failed because there’s always someone new who can replace the head of the organization. This isn’t some leftist critique, this is what the US government learned from more than a decade of trying to make that tactic work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

The drone program is basically an assembly line that creates war crimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Let’s take the bin Laden raid as an example. We flew helicopters into a sovereign nation. We attacked a civilian structure. We killed many civilians including bin Laden. There are grounds for war crimes there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Oddly enough, the way we create terrorist organizations is to capitate the organizations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

The way we fight terrorists is to decapitate the head of their organization

That’s why ISIS, Al-Qaeda affiliates, and the Taliban no longer exist…oh wait

This nonsense “logic” doesn’t even work in video games, it literally ignores the reality of organizations based on physically decentralized but financially centralized cell groups, not even the American War collages believe what you’re peddling

You may argue they shouldn’t be killed in the first place, but I believe it was necessary.

Of course you do, you probably get off on it

permalink
report
parent
reply

And that’s why there isn’t any more terrorism in the world right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

No one is blaming the US for killing terrorist with drones. The US us blamed for killing thousands of civilians.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Nobody is blaming the US for killing terrorist[s] with drones

I mean, I am. Most of the people they label terrorists are either their own CIA funded/armed proxies or geopolitical enemies and not really terrorists in the full jihadist sense (such as Iranian intel officers or Syrian military or Libyan government officials). It’s just a convenient excuse for the US to involve themselves in other nations affairs - fund and arm terrorists in a nation you want to destroy, then say you “have” to go in to “fight terrorism” and obliterate the nation.

It’s all bullshit. America will never eliminate terrorism. They are the biggest sponsor of terror on Earth. There would be far less total terrorism if they never once left their borders

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I am. they created the problem then created more problems trying to resolve the blowback

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

People die in war, that’s a fact. But I would say it makes little difference if it’s a drone or a rifle.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The way we fight terrorists is to decapitate the head of their organization.

When you definitely understand how to wage COIN effectively.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The way we fight terrorists is to decapitate the head of their organization

No, it’s to have soldiers blast an oblong opening in the head of any Middle-Easterner they get their blood-soaked hands on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments