You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
46 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

I don’t hear it said enough in explicit terms, so it’s worth saying now.

Meritocracy is bad, you should not want it as a leftist.

On top of what you’ve said, I’d add that it’s an op, never true, and the original word is a parody of the idea. Even if it worked in theory, it’s not a good thing.

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. That is what we’re aiming for.

You don’t need a hierarchy based on talent to do that. That will erase the thing you’re trying to achieve. People can manage themselves on democratic grounds, more or less.

This isn’t even hypothetical. For a while, the game company Valve operated this way. They voted on each other’s salaries, they had no official titles or bosses. Employees in aggregate are generally pretty good, in a non toxic environment, about evaluating the talent of another employee and coming up with what a fair salary would be.

Workplace democracy might seem like a meme, but it’s a real, practical thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need. That is what we’re aiming for.

They voted on each other’s salaries, they had no official titles or bosses. Employees in aggregate are generally pretty good, in a non toxic environment, about evaluating the talent of another employee and coming up with what a fair salary would be.

The Valve scenario is a great example of what we should be working for right now, but it’s pretty far from “from each according to their ability, to each according to their need.” If your coworkers vote you a high salary, they’re doing that more on some meritocratic principle than on consideration of what you need.

Until we’re in a completely post-scarcity society, workplace democracy (combined with the means of decent living guaranteed to everyone) is a better target than “from each according to their ability, to each according to their need.” A democratic workplace where income is determined by peers gives workers incentives for being more productive, which (at least according to Blackshirts and Reds) was lacking in the USSR. It also acts as a check against the most productive workers turning reactionary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Any idea why Valve stopped?

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t know for sure that they have. But I remember hearing about their model in 2012, and no one has reported on it since.

They’ve gotten weirder and greedier now, and they basically don’t make games anymore, so I have no idea if that model is still being used.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments