You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
65 points

Too heavy and still not enough armor? Oof lol

permalink
report
reply
55 points

It’s near impossible for modern MBT armour to stop a good hit from an equally modern ATGM or APFSDS round. The best way to survive is to not get spotted and hit in the first place. That’s why Soviet doctrine had it right, quick low profile tanks with “decent enough” armour. Hard and soft kill APS can help with RPGs and ATGMs but after seeing how the Trophy system of the IOF is absolute dogshit I don’t think it’ll be enough.

I think if natoids wanted an effective combat platform over grifting money, they would develop a tank with good all around protection against autocannons, but just enough armour on the frontal arc to get lucky vs dedicated anti tank weapons. If you have a 70 ton tank that gets penetrated by Kornets, might as well make a 50 ton tank that gets penetrated by Kornets instead and can actually cross bridges.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

the Trophy system of the IOF

In October 2023, Hamas used civilian DJI and Autel quadcopter drones, which dropped shaped-charge grenades to damage or destroy several Merkava tanks.

When your half ton multi million dollar state of the art tank defense is consistently defeated by $150 quadcopters available at Best Buy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I remember when those quadcopters were super expensive too, stay winning China

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

if natoids wanted an effective combat platform over grifting money, they would develop a tank with good all around protection against autocannons, but just enough armour on the frontal arc to get lucky vs dedicated anti tank weapons.

That’s just a Leopard 1 with ERA bricks.

So yeah, you’re probably not wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

This is pretty much why tanks are being phased out for missile vehicles or personnel carriers, in the same vein why battleships are not made anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Missile vehicles? Like what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

I should’ve probably clarified that MBTs as we currently know them are being phased out for lighter armored tanks with capabilities from the designs of missile vehicles or personnel carries. But specifically the USMC are getting rid of their MBTs entirely to develop lightly armored rocket launchers like the HIMARS.

Also the US Army are still holding on to the Abrams, but they are also open about how future development is based on the principal that current MBTs have hit their weight limit. So in the next decade or so we’ll probably see Abrams variants with less armor but heavily incorporating some design of missile and rocket carriers.

(There’s also drones/unmanned vehicles, but I doubt we’ll see any concrete media about that for a while)

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Metal Gear?!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Hey at least they can plow. Tanks into plowshares or however that goes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@hexbear.net

Create post

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it’s a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we’ll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Community stats

  • 26

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 143K

    Comments