2 points
*
I did and I agree with the author. You do not have to agree with us. It’s a form vs function argument. There is not a “right absolute” answer, it’s about how you approach the question.
7 points
*
then we agree that it’s incorrect to definitively say that a “palm tree” is not a tree.
rigidly defending the boundaries of a biological category that’s not a monophylitic group is an exercise in futility. or maybe in linguistics, because if it’s not monophyletic it’s not “real” in an evolutionary sense and the question is in the cultural realm and somewhat subjective. It’s like the discussions about whether a certain food is a fruit/vegetable/etc.
3 points
*
I see it as a paradox. :) I don’t like calling them trees. I just call them palms.
