The whole “what’s false”? They’re arguing that because the context was he thinks kids have it easier now he’s too much of an old cunt to relate and care or something. Last sentence: “oh he doesn’t literally mean what he literally said”
Okay, so the issue is basically that the claim itself is a strawman. I’m not sure that I see any sunlight between “I have no empathy for young people” and “I think kids today have it easier” considering that kids do not, in fact, have it easier by any objective measure. Like, what possible argument could there be for life being harder for young people in the 60s?