Science is incapable of ever being truthful because every scientist is an amoral wannabee friend of Jeffrey Epstein. These nerds literally take lessons in school to learn how to beg for patronage to do research. Of course their studies usually end up being about managerial bourgeois praxis like using skull shape measurements to categorize workers. That’s what personality psychology is about at the end of the day, Brave New World style eugenics with humane empathy for wage slaves.
Okay that’s true, but on the flip side you got people trying to stan astrology so hard they end up saying ridiculous crap like this.
Science is incapable of ever being truthful because every scientist is an amoral wannabee friend of Jeffrey Epstein. These nerds literally take lessons in school to learn how to beg for patronage to do research. Of course their studies usually end up being about managerial bourgeois praxis like using skull shape measurements to categorize workers. That’s what personality psychology is about at the end of the day, Brave New World style eugenics with humane empathy for wage slaves.
And I’ll repeat myself, if you’re gonna demand hard evidence for my claim you should present hard evidence for yours. If there’s evidence that it’s TOTALLY harmless I’m all ears.
If all you have are anecdotes my anecdotes are equally valid.
You know I didn’t invoke evidence right? you implied its existence and I called you out for making shit up.
You know I admitted my evidence was totally anecdotal right? And you still made a claim, I made a counter claim, I’m beholden to the same standard of evidence you abided by for your initial claim.
but if you go on astrology YouTube and Twitter you’ll probably find some figures to back up what I’m saying.
edit: wait oh shit did you mean the other kind of figures
if that’s the case than I’ve been making a scene over a total misinterpretation
