:bjp-cool: I hope a naxalite parodies Modi one of this days

tweet :some-controversy:

actual tweet :bjp-cool:

Just like the USSR

As expected, these guys don’t give a shit about the Chinese people toiling under le evil SeeSeePee, considering how much of a disaster the USSR’s break-up was for tens of millions of people. They only care that a threat to the current world order is eliminated.

Also, imagine caring so much for the current world order when your country isn’t even at the top. Hindu Nationalism is one hell of a drug.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Liberals and leftists who dislike the CCP MUST understand that if the “evil CCP” is defeated, China will go down the EXACT same path as Russia. Leftists especially need to understand what color revolutions are. It seriously disturbs me how many “leftists” absolutely DESPISE China but have never done anything to counter U.S. imperialism.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s infuriating because many of those “leftists” are simultaneously under the delusion that it’s best for everyone involved “in the long run” (but also Russia bad lol), for both China and the World. Even way back when I was an anti-China/USSR SocDem, I thought the USSR collapsing the way it did was an objectively terrible thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

I always found it interesting that the Tiananmen Square protests happened in 1989 right when all the other “pro-democracy” protests in the socialist world did, but it didn’t succeed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
Tankiest I've ever been

This is why the repression at Tiananmen Square ended up being good for China in the long run

permalink
report
parent
reply

“The students are nuts if they think this handful of people can overthrow our Party and our government.”

– Wang Zhen, Chinese Communist official, May 1989

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

It seriously disturbs me how many “leftists” absolutely DESPISE China but have never done anything to counter U.S. imperialism.

They’re just neolibs who want Healthcare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Years of imperial conditioning leaves lots of :brainworms: .

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Damn out comes my inner :meow-tankie:

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

if the “evil CCP” is defeated, China will go down the EXACT same path as Russia

The original play from the West was to install a Capital-friendly apparatchik akin to Yeltsin in the politburo. But Bo Xilai was ousted by Xi Jinping for doing far too many crimes for the rest of the leadership’s tastes.

The effort to control China from above backfired in much the same way it backfired in Russia. But with the added twist that Communism, as an ideology, reasserted itself more strongly than at any point in post-Cold War geopolitics.

If “the evil CCP” is defeated, what Americans may find themselves with is an even more Based leftist movement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

considering how much of a disaster the USSR’s break-up was for tens of millions of people

Given the center-of-mass that is Russian regional politics and economics, I would not be surprised if the USSR reconstituted itself in some form over the next century. Similarly, the BRI out of China will create durable trade and travel routes that tie it to neighboring states and provinces in a manner not unlike the US Rail and Highway systems unified post-Civil War America.

Unlike the EU, which has shaped up more as a trade union than a real economic union, these other states are building real physical infrastructure to cement the legal and economic relationships they are forging through politics.

That was - ostensibly - Modi’s pitch to the country when he took office half a decade ago. But Modi consistently failed to deliver, while putting economic pressure on rural states in a way that’s fracturing his country along party lines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I would not be surprised if the USSR reconstituted itself in some form over the next century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_State

Russia has supposedly been in a long and slow process of eventually merging with Belarus. A couple other countries have expressed interest in joining too, including breakaway states like Abkhazia and South Ossetia. But the whole thing doesn’t seem certain to actually happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nothing is certain, and the US is certainly fighting tooth-and-nail to prevent it.

But how long we can keep blue-balling every other emerging regional power on the planet is questionable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Except unlike China the USSR was actually consciously structured as a union of separate nations which were able to break apart with some degree of continuity. China has probably had a majority of its modern land mass since like 1000 AD. Outside of the East Turkestan movement and Tibet, are there even movements within China that would even want to form a separate nation?

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Not really. Many regions with cultural minorities like Inner Mongolia seem to have some tensions over things like Language education, but no real separatist movements worth mentioning

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

People eagerly awaiting the break up of China are the same ones penning articles about how foolish it would be for Scotland to exit the UK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

PRC likes doing this X autonomous region/prefecture thing for their minorities and makes conscious effort to preserve their language and culture. Maybe that could be construed as a union of separate nations?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I think that’s on the level of like saying that the different native reservations in the USA would become separate states. Except not really because the Autonomous regions actually have significantly more autonomy than the reservations do.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Except not really because the Autonomous regions actually have significantly more autonomy than the reservations do.

Shouldn’t that encourage separatism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

I have a feeling that even the Tibet and East Turkestan separatist movements are exaggerated. Certainly they are no more serious than the Catalan independence movement that was quite brutally crushed with hardly a side note in the media. For the rest of China, I don’t even think it is on the radar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Must be nice, here the catalan movement is brought up whenerver it looks like the government might do something good for Catalonia.

“Hurr durr, our government is trying to get their support with bribes, grumble grumble” “Our government is trying to break Spain, grrr”

The government might FINALLY pardon and release some independentist leaders and the conservative press is being extremely annoying. (Just like the liberal press, which is “concerned”).

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m Canadian and it sounds roughly similar to Quebec. Everyone always complains that they are sort of bribed to stay in Canada. Really they just know how to do politics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s hard for a westerner to gauge the popularity of these things with the sources available to us because like Chinese government certainly publishing any polls about the popularity of Tibetan independence, and you obviously expect US sources to exaggerate these things, but I have no doubt that there is probably a fair number of people who support that, but if there were even a few cranks supporting independence for whatever region the usual suspects would be running with the story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s not really a black and white issue because you can have greater autonomy while staying a part of China. From what I can understand, some degree of regional autonomy was basically baked into the system when it was realized fairly early on that China was way too big and complex to be effectively centrally planned, and that a degree of regional autonomy was essential. I think it is only natural that these regions should agitate for a greater degree of regional autonomy, but if they break completely from China then they only leave themselves open to exploitation by other imperialist forces.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You make a fair point, but is it likely though, considering the approval ratings?

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
27 points
  1. I think it’s a case of vaguely knowing that that used to be a state in that region and assuming that means it can be a breakaway republic.
permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Unlike China, India needs to be balkanized. The north eastern states don’t want to be a part of India. So do Kashmir. India as a whole didn’t exist until the British forced it to become like that. Racism runs rampant but this fucks will act like it doesn’t exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Kerala didn’t elect one BJP seat, they really despise that movement and want nothing to do with it, or really anything that goes on in Northern India.

India doesn’t need to be Balkanized, they need a cultural revolution. The semi-feudal caste system is a disgusting relic and it needs to go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Caste system doesn’t exist throughout the country. Stop looking at the country as a monolith. Kerala not electing a BJP candidate isn’t the reason why I said it needs to be balkanized. BJP aren’t popular in other non communist majority states either.

Look at the North Eastern states and the rest of the country. They are literally treated as a second class citizen in their own country. If anyone says otherwise then I will slap them silly. The cultural difference between the regions are more evident than in those calling for Uyghur self determination

permalink
report
parent
reply

Has balkanization ever improved things?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

In the case of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, no. Czechoslovakia splitting did actually help both nations move forward with more autonomy. And Bangladesh splitting from Pakistan did as well.

It really depends on the circumstances within each country tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Manchukuo was supposed to be a part of china too, ‘Manchuria’ with modern borders has never been, nor ever professed to be, an independent state

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Not only that, the five colours of the flag (adapted from the republican Five colour flag) is supposed to represent the five major ethnicities of China. The Han, the Manchus, the Mongols, the Hui (Various Muslim ethnicities), and the Tibetans.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I was positive the Hui were just Muslim Han.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s apparently a bit more complex than that. The current definition is narrower than the one the Nationalists used.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

And the Hong Kong flag, what’s up with that blue and white? They already have a very recognizable flag, why wouldn’t they just use that one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why would Manchuria use the flag of Manchukuo, the imperial Japanese puppet state?

Because the author has :brainworms:

permalink
report
parent
reply

:wojak-nooo: any day now!!!

permalink
report
reply
30 points

We all know that if shit goes loud the shaolin temple will send warrior monks to take over the surrouding territories

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Wu-Tang! Wu-Tang! Wu-Tang!

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments