people from all corners of twitter
based PMC class solidarity! :epstein:
The noxious class character of these woke twitter socialists is why they got so mad at Shaun, the nicest boy online. Being a sweet and earnest person talking about collective struggle is “idiotic” to these insignificant and low statured creatures. It makes sense that these cannibalistic podcasters are forced to believe that growth is infinite and entropy doesn’t exist. Their entire ideology relies on them justifying imperialism because these whiny bloodless Karens have desires that matter more than their child slaves (“To shift the responsibility of Nestle using slave labor to the consumer is fucking monstrous”…“Jeff Bezos should consume less. no one else” this Breadtuber has the same petit bourgeois consumption based ideology as that Ian MIles Cheong freak)
When your entire existence is predicated on exploitation, you have no other concept of “love and faith in humanity” than being able to continue genocide of indigenous people for your imperialist desires. Will these irrelevant soy podcasters ever get their “faith restored” by working in the fields like their apartheid child slaves? Noooo, that’s Stalinism :amber:
Degrowth is an ideology that requires them to go outside (uh oh, sorry vampires!) and “touch grass” as these domesticated losers claim is so important and meaningful to their lives. But if they are actually forced to do that wendigo meme praxis, that’s apparently “violent authoritarianism”? Ironic
If we didn’t throw away half of our food but only had what we were going to eat, or standard of living would be reduced. If cities, work and shopping were planned so you could walk, bike and use transit to get around instead of sitting for hours each day in a metal box with wheels of standard of living would be reduced. If stuff were built to last and be repairable instead of being replaced every two years, our standard of living would be reduced.
Would we be worse off? Would we be less happy? I don’t think so.
Standard of living is also an average. If we had no rich oligarchs sailing around in yachts and living in palaces “we” would have a lower standard of living but the vast majority would be better off.
Once you have enough to satisfy your basic needs for food, shelter and safety and once you have enough to lead a dignified existence and participate in society more wealth does not translate into greater happiness.
Mold, what the fuck are you even talking about at this point?
Sorry, I had to spell that one out rather than use an emote because that’s how much I don’t understand what I’m looking at.
:jesse-wtf:
soy radlibs
You called? :vegan-tofu:
What did Shaun say?
Millennials would largely be okay with the standard if living they currently have (ie worse than gen x and boomers at the same age) if they knew the resources they weren’t getting were going to fight climate change instead of to make the bourgeoisie even richer, basically.
