China has already enacted strict measures aimed at preventing sex-selective abortions, and health authorities also warned in 2018 that the use of abortion to end unwanted pregnancies was harmful to women’s bodies and risked causing infertility.

The state council said the new guidelines, issued on Monday, would aim to improve women’s overall access to pre-pregnancy healthcare services.

32 points
*

Clickbate headline, seems like it’s overall a positive thing if by “non-medical” purposes they mean addressing the issue with “sex-selective abortions”.

Obviously there are other material conditions regarding gender equality that motivated that trend in the first place that also should be addressed but I don’t see this as being problematic in any way.

permalink
report
reply
22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah. The headline is pretty misleading if that’s the case. Maybe this should have been posted in the_dunk_tank.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

Access to abortions being limited is really unfortunate, but sex-selective abortion is terrible and I understand the need to do something about it.

The article also has no details of what is meant by “limit”, so I assume this is :lmayo: news doing what it usually does.

Edit: look at that, I was right. https://hexbear.net/post/142489/comment/1694483

permalink
report
reply

totally headline baiting from a shitty lib outlet as usual. sex-selective abortions are an issue, and this is part of a broader way to address socially conservatist sexism within China

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Saw this on :reddit-logo: and felt compelled to read the article. It felt very light on detail and I came away wondering what the actual new rules are.

Is it literally just a ban on sex-selective abortions? Because the headline makes it sound like China is going full Texas with an exception on “health of the mother is threatened” abortions.

permalink
report
reply
34 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Yeah, there’s another stormfront thread on worldnews with a Reuters article about this that is instead titled

China says will reduce the number of abortions for “non-medical purposes”

And someone in the comments stated that if you look at the actual document, the context of reducing non-medical abortions is that they’re going to be improving sex education and access to medical care and contraceptives to reduce the number of people who need these abortions in the first place.

That’s objectively and wholely good, but I’m sure we’ll see a tidal wave of propaganda along the lines of this Guardian article.

EDIT: oughta just include the comment’s text actually:

China isn’t limiting abortion as a choice. China is promoting sex education to prevent unwanted pregnancy. It’s literally the sentence right before the one quoted in the title, which is relevant to the topic but for some reason wasn’t referenced in the article.

增强男女两性性道德、性健康、性安全意识,倡导共担避孕责任。将生殖健康服务融入妇女健康管理全过程,保障妇女享有避孕节育知情自主选择权。落实基本避孕服务项目,加强产后和流产后避孕节育服务,提高服务可及性,预防非意愿妊娠。

Google translate: Enhance the awareness of sexual ethics, sexual health, and safe sex in both men and women, and advocate shared responsibility for contraception. Integrate reproductive health services into the process of women’s health management to ensure women’s right to be informed and independently choose contraception. Implement basic contraceptive service projects, improve postpartum and post-abortion contraception and birth control services, improve service accessibility, and prevent unwanted pregnancy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Access to abortion shouldn’t be limited, need for abortion should be.

two parts of liberation from bourgeois dictatorship

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 198

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments