Permanently Deleted

41 points

against callousness and cruelty.

wonder what set of incentives are driving the callousness and cruelty

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

yeh sounds like the kids are mad at the state of sexuality in a crushing neoliberal state

permalink
report
parent
reply

I really question how much real buy in sex positive feminist actually had with the mainstream underneath all the media saturation. Even the old sub was like 50/50 on if people supported this stuff and now all the splinter boards are against it except hexbear.

permalink
report
reply

which splinter boards?

permalink
report
parent
reply

trueanon, genzedong, redscare and blackwolfeed. I guess I should clarify I mean splinter as in boards a lot of the old posters went to and where you see the same content posted as here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s probably a class thing. I know that among the people I went to college with (kids who could afford private college in the aughts), sex positivity was basically a universally accepted position. I also know that a lot of my working-class comrades are a lot less comfortable with the culture of sexuality and sexualization than my classmates were. Some of that is a product of the commodification of sex, some of that is the unfortunate psychological specter of puritanism, and a lot of it is a product of alienation as sex, like everything else, can’t actually fix any of the things about us which are broken.

All that being said, it’s important to see Goldberg for what she’s doing here: she’s using a real social skepticism towards the commodified world of sex we live in as a broader attack on kink and sex-work while misrepresenting grey-ace/demisexual people as just old-fashioned romantics. The conflation of kink and abuse she barely even tries to paper over, the suggestion of horror that people might feel into harder kinks - that shit is fucked up. Practiced responsibly, kink is nothing of the sort, and people like Goldberg are actively making things worse by promoting the idea that kink and abuse are inextricable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
16 points

one step closer to recognizing the entire economy is coercive :marx-goth:

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sooner or later, everyone who thinks about society long enough ends up reinventing Marxism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yes, genuinely good. imo it’s regressive for the article to try to frame it as “sex negativity”. It’s combating patriarchy and not allowing them to define sex.

permalink
report
parent
reply

because it’s corny libshit, but also because no one was actually doing anything to get over their deep seated terror of their own bodies (the tools for which would have actually had to come from the radical feminist tradition which was shut out of mainstream, marketable feminist discourse, and which is often caricaturized as “sex negative”).

permalink
report
reply
40 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
9 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You should start this off by affirming support for demi people and then asking your question. I’m not demi, so I can’t answer that. If you want to learn more, I’m sure there are some good demi subreddits you could read through (but not post in).

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

Hook up culture and the prolificness of porn I think flaty disproves many claims it’s the norm to be demi

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t think hookup culture is the norm, I think it just has good marketing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 198

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments