Replacing an international publicly-funded institution for the advancement of science with pods for Silicon Valley psychos to do coke and jack off in. We are in the bad timeline.

40 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
14 points

So if you can’t pay the rent do they just space you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

:amogus:

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Maybe, but if capitalism does in fact rely on a pool of excess and disposable labor to keep bargaining power down, it’s more likely that we’ll have slums in space, tenement stations that capitalists will point to as evidence of the beneficence of the system and as an implicit warning to anyone thinking of asking for something beyond their station. Maybe earth will be the slum.

permalink
report
parent
reply

yeet

permalink
report
parent
reply

I can, and then I think of the certain episodes in “Vivy: Fluorite Eye’s Song” sounds like a pretty reasonable thing to happen to capitalist space buisnesses

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Cyberpunk dystopia but without any of the cool stuff.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

So you are telling me they are gonna have davos in a place without oxygen built by the lowest bidder? Comrade bezos gonna do thr revolution for us

permalink
report
reply

Comrade Xi, send the anti-sattelite missile now

permalink
report
parent
reply

Can the DF-21 be adapted to hit things in space?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I know it’s a joke, but the real answer is that if you wanted to destroy something in orbit, it would be very, very difficult. This goes out the window if you want to send up a well-timed nuke that blows up in the general area of your target, but this is still very difficult and not advisable.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The fun part about all of these short sighted uncoordinated private space venture is that a single disaster have the potential to start a catastrophic chain reaction that’ll destroy everything in orbit and locks humanity away from space for centuries.

permalink
report
reply
19 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Knowing what you’re talking about to own the libs.

permalink
report
parent
reply

oh wow its the horse from the podcast! Pleasure to meet you Mr Chapo, would you like a carrot?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ideally none of this would be necessary and the ISS could have been placed in an orbit high enough that it would stay up for decades without boosts and other precautions, but the ISS had to be placed into an orbit reachable by both Soyuz and the space shuttle. Neither of those are/were capable of going much higher in altitude.

I’d thought it would be ideal beyond technical limitations since the trade-off for the occasional boost is that it is *much * easier to reach the ISS in LEO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

Brian Cox said he’s in favour of this because it means in the future everyone will do it and not just billionaires, which ignores everyone in the 3rd world and the fact that by then they’ll have moved on to something even more ridiculous

Oh and also that’s really not how it works at all anyways so

permalink
report
reply
10 points

pull yourself up by your bootstraps and build yourself a space station, you lazy poors just dont want to work for it

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ugh I hate that man. Brian Cox is a right wing wanker that was in the band that wrote Blair’s election theme tune. Of course he’d be down for building Slough in space, it’d make his fucking day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the final frontier: slough in space

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Come friendly photon torpedoes

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 198

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments