8 points

I actually just found this article PDF published in Foreign Affairs of all places back in 2014 that largely agrees with this.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

There’s one from last week that argues Putin is going for stopping NATO expansion: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2021-12-28/what-putin-really-wants-ukraine

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Yes i feel like I’m going crazy that we’re relitigating the exact same thing 8 years later and people still haven’t learned anything

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
19 points

Maybe Russia should just apply to join NATO. Wouldn’t that fix everything?

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
17 points

oh god dammit

I thought I was on to something real :halal:

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Its got some 11D chess energy to it. Like, what does NATO even do if two member states go to war?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

How has this been published in the spectator?

permalink
report
reply

Europe isn’t nearly as enamored of the idea of hosting a war for the US as the US is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I know that mainland isnt, but is britain?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Depends on who you mean - the government is pretty excited. The Spectator’s partisan lean isn’t easily findable, but I don’t think they are in line with the current generation of Tory rags.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The US absolutely spends most it’s time putting out fires they themselves caused but i wouldn’t give them the credit that they started the fires on purpose

permalink
report
parent
reply

I think you’re giving the US natsec state a lot more credit than they deserve. Always important to remember that these people are morons who get where they are by believing what they’re told to believe. Not that I don’t enjoy the image of the US as the traveling petrol salesman.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah, it’s one of those ideas that is much less appetizing when it’s in your front yard as opposed to in someone else’s front yard 2000 miles away

permalink
report
parent
reply

That and the US has been completely obvious about how thirsty it is for this conflict, and the last time the US security state got really thirsty for war, it went quite poorly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

i was kinda surprised too seeing them publish Richard Sakwa, thought it was a good article. but right wing populists like Tucker Carlson are also amiable towards this rhetoric too so im not too surprised?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@hexbear.net

Create post

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we’re all comrades here.

Community stats

  • 107

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 127K

    Comments