:gulag:
“Here’s why an organization formed for the explicit purpose of combating the left with military force is actually good for the left.”
BRB telling Libya, that went from the country with the highest HDI in africa to an open air slave market, that they simply do not understand that NATO is wholesome 100
:gaddafi-stern:
vaush has clearly taken up the path of the jestermaxxer by larping as a leftist and posting like a liberal, thereby maximizing the number of people who find him insufferable (which we all know correlates directly with epic basedness)
“I legitimately feel like NATO in its existence really doesn’t do anything to materially suppress the cause for socialists worldwide today and I feel like the insistence on hyper-fixating on NATO from the perspective of a leftist has been a PSYOP in favor of the Russian government…NATO itself doesn’t facilitate anything other than protecting countries in eastern europe from aggression from Russia…I don’t think that NATO does that much at all really except for preventing Russia imperialism.”
That’s essentially the crux of the argument, or at least the most relevant bits that I had the patience to gather because there’s no way I’m watching all 12 minutes of that shit.
Yes because the coordination and frameworks that NATO creates dont have wider implications for geopolitics in general… fuckin brainlet.
Literally the first sentence of the (CIA)wikipedia article on it:
On 19 March 2011, a multi-state NATO-led coalition began a military intervention in Libya, to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, in response to events during the First Libyan Civil War.
gosh dang why wont these leftists support an implicitly imperialist organization
![[CW: Vaush] There is no mask.(hexbear.net)](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/bBrgFiTWNe.jpg){kind=link}