your weekly dose of hankschannel libshit. the description is pure “the president couldn’t possibly have lied or made a mistake” copium

HOW IS HIS TAKEAWAY FROM ALL THIS THAT TWITTER IS BAD BUT BIDEN IS GOOD

47 points

Good lord I fucking hate this cracker and his dipshit brother

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Biden is doing his best which is the problem

permalink
report
reply

to be clear, twitter is bad, but not because it tells people when biden is lying without giving Hank enough Details and Context. I mean ffs this all happened ages ago and I could have told you exactly what he spent the whole video researching and whinging about how complicated it was. It’s not that complicated.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

hahahaha its the original soyjak who “fucking loves science”!!!

I remember he recently shat out a video about how the solution to homelessness is to build more houses because: “akkording to muh soyience, supply must be down because demand and price lines go up!”

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Built by who? Owned by who? What’s stoping those homes from immediatly being bought up by investment capital and being rented out at the “fair market rate”?

Fucks sake I’m sick of the “I don’t understand why they don’t just…” solutions

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Fucks sake I’m sick of the “I don’t understand why they don’t just…” solutions

I don’t understand why we don’t just abolish the landlord class

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They dont have solutions for housing or homelessness without abandoning their politics. They get very mad when you point out their Build More Housing No Matter What Kind is just trickle down economics from the 80s applied to an inelastic good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

rented out at the “fair market rate” *to aquaman FTFY

Fucks sake I’m sick of the “I don’t understand why they don’t just…” solutions

Liberals, naiive people who think they know the “cold hard truth about the reality™”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I remember he recently shat out a video about how the solution to homelessness is to build more houses because

Hot take, I agree with the Libs on this one, we should be building more housing. The country is increasingly urbanizing, which should be a good thing, but local petite bourg real estate owners want to restrict supply to make their assets more valuable. Hence the affordability crisis. Throwing up more high rises in Cali would do a lot to help lower housing costs and reduce homelessness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I don’t agree with libs on this one. More housing doesn’t directly relate to more affordable housing. If it was affordable high rises, sure. But the housing we’re building is “market rates” and higher and that just doesn’t push down prices, it drags prices up.

Housing is an inelastic good and landlords will charge whatever they “can” which is based off other available houses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I should have prefaced, as a socialist I think we should build more PUBLIC housing. That would address the problem more quickly and directly.

However…

landlords will charge whatever they “can” which is based off other available houses.

Part of the reason they can charge so much is they don’t have much competition, any open space is going to have a lot of people competing for it so you can Jack up prices, somebody will probably be able to pay. If there was more selection people could go for cheaper options and landlords wouldn’t be able to ask exorbitant prices for subpar properties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

like making more housing is kinda of the solution, the problem is that you don’t need to build houses as much as should retrofit existing buildings that are empty in dense urbans spaces into housing, as they would have access to much better infrastructure and would be cheaper and less damaging to de enviroment as building materials have such a fucked up carbon footprint due to their production, like i am from brazil and i think the best thing lula did was his proposal to use old federal buildings that have lost their use into housing (for example, a bunch of stuff in rio that is on the most valued land with a bunch of transportation and infrastructure already built in that lost their function when the capital moved to Brasilia) which is incredibly better than the other program that we already had from his first term that builds houses because those tend to be so far away from where people actually live on the areas that have the least job oportunities

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

In areas where that’s viable, I agree. Issue is in a lot of newer, usually Western US cities, restrictive zoning resulted in a lot of low density, single family development. In some cases it probably would be more efficient to replace some of it with higher density apartment complexes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There’s plenty of houses already. building houses doesn’t work if the new house immediatly gets bought by an investment firm that rents it out for 1.5x the areas median income.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The whole thing with investment firms buying up housing as a speculative asset is really only a problem in places like NYC, on the Marco scale they’re a drop in the bucket. This is really more caused by upper middle class people who want to drive their home prices up to fund their retirement than it is BlackRock.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Throwing up more high rises in Cali would do a lot to help lower housing costs and reduce homelessness.

Is there any example of this occurring, because these high rises in California are all exclusively going for 4-5k a month for a 1 bedroom, which im not sure is very helpful for a population thay struggles to pay any rent

The libs are not right because they do not agree with you on public housing, its all mArKeT bAsEd SoLuTiOns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Never mnid thats fair enough then, idk much about “the economy” other than its function according to the POSIWID* maxim, its a bit weird that we need to build way more houses than physically necessary otherwise people will die on the streets.

but local petite bourg real estate owners want to restrict supply…

However, there seem to be other more video game based solutions to the problem…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

its a bit weird that we need to build way more houses than physically necessary otherwise people will die on the streets

The issue is the areas people are moving to don’t have enough supply generally. Yeah there’s a lot of vacant homes but a lot of them are in like, Bumfuck Nebraska. Thing is there actually is a lot of affordable housing in the US, it’s just far away from all the job and infrastructure, that’s why a culture of “super commuters” who drive like two hours to an office in LA to work exists now, and why during the pandemic a bunch of workers who went remote decided to go buy houses in West Virginia and Idaho.

permalink
report
parent
reply

tbf there are localized supply issues. But there’s also a “rich fucks have lost their basic humanity and ability to live in a society” problem that requires fixing before any serious solutions can really be entertained :gui:

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

housing first does not mean we must jerk off to trickle down economics. also its projected half of all homes will be owned by corporations in 2030

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

half of all homes will be owned by corporations in 2030

We need him back

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Hank Green is just that guy from Mentopolis. You can’t convince me he’s a Youtuber.

permalink
report
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments