This is just another inference.
“Got to use inference where I actually mean speculation because I wanna sound smart but don’t know what either word actually means.”
Guy can be in full Hitler cosplay and you’ll get Libs insisting that this doesn’t prove anything, it was just a joke.
But then you say literally anything about Azov Battalion or Adrian Zenz, and you’re instantly reported for being a bot.
“Have you considered Mr Freikorps over here could just be into Asian mysticism? Red’s a lucky colour in China and that swastika is just because he’s a Jainist. He’s not heiling Hitler, he’s just waving and the cameras caught him a t a weird angle. Really, you’re the true nazi for acussing this innocent freedom fighter of hating Jews.”
Infer (v): to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence
This is how the fourth Reich rises, with libs assuring us Richard ‘Adolf’ Spencer is too young to be a member of the nationalachachelen dutch arby’s party.
a person has a hammer and sickle tattoo in [current year]
`oh the humanity!!! are you a holodomor apologist???’
a person has a sonnerad or swastika or wolfsangel or 1488 whatever other esoteric shit they use in [current year]
‘excuse me sweaty unless you can prove they were in the NSDAP I think your accusation is historically inaccurate’
UMMMMM, well akshually people might just wear swatikas casually, they aren’t hardcore or even official party members, umkay sweaty:maybe-later-honey:
You’re not a racist unless you’re burning a cross on some minority family’s yard, at night, while chanting old Klan slogans, while wearing authentic Klan robes (thanks wikipedia)
Otherwise, it’s just an inference
You’re not a racist unless you’re burning a cross on some minority family’s yard, at night, while chanting old Klan slogans, while wearing authentic Klan robes (thanks wikipedia)
Um, akutly, these people are just economically insecure and if you would just listen to their point of view maybe we could find a middle ground that only involves half a lynching.
