I got such an aneurysm from reading the next reply (see link) I decided I had to let you all read this brainrot:

Also yes, .world is so low hanging fruit. But this one is slightly different.

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/23635227/11814221

13 points

Authoritarianism

This is an irrelevant observation since any government that wants to survive is going to engage in methods that others will inevitably regard as ‘authoritarian’. You may as well say that fascism and communism are the same because fascists and communists both wear clothes. Who cares?

Ideology revolves around common enemies - In fascism this comes in the form certain [sic] ethnicities or nationalities

I like how the author conveniently forgot to mention fascism’s war on socialists. Also, one could just as easily argue that anticommunist ideology — in general, not only fascism — revolves around common enemies as well.

Bitterly oppose materialism - Fascism opposes materialism because it is deemed to lack acknowledgement of the role of the spirit, while Marxism opposes materialism because it is deem [sic] to be a key engine in class warfare.

I think that what the author did here was first use ‘materialism’ in the scientific sense (the principle that everything that exists is material), then used the word in the sense of avarice. This certainly wouldn’t be the first time that an anticommunist forcibly made a clunky false equivalence, and it won’t be the last.

Bitterly oppose individualism

See here.

Explicit support of political violence

Anticommunists: famous for never endorsing political violence!

Marxism calls for […] killing the entirety of the bourgeoisie

https://imgur.artemislena.eu/XIvQWno

When you look at the more pragmatic ideologies around, you’ll notice that they don’t have enemies that define the ideology. Take for example, modern day social democracy. Who are it’s enemies? It doesn’t really have any. The ideology is more focused on specific values and approaches to issues rather than trying to define an enemy group as the root cause of everything. The same goes for liberalism.

islam as an ideology revolves around fighting the nonbelievers because they are ignorant sinners

I think that I’ve had enough.

permalink
report
reply

I explicitly support political violence

permalink
report
reply
12 points

AI could generate a response that feels less AI generated.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

It is truly incredibly how a group of people can argue about something that clearly none of them have any hint of understanding of. McCarthyism making communism and socialism dirty words did its work I guess, good fucking gods. I want to scream ‘No investigation, no right to speak!’ at these people, but they actually think they understand anything about politics.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

If these people could understand about politics, they wouldn’t be liberalSS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If you think about it, supporting a militant lower‐class movement that wants to help other workers raise their living standards is really no different from supporting a petty bourgeois party that wants to imprison or massacre thousands of rebellious workers and subjugate the rest to the bourgeoisie. Here are some shocking similarities:

  1. Both are political.
  2. Both care about class.
  3. Both have goals.
  4. Both want to meet their goals.
  5. Both want life to be better for somebody.
  6. Both will use violence for something.
  7. Both have a red color somewhere in their symbols.
  8. Both have ideas.
  9. Both care about things.
  10. Both do stuff a lot.
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Socialism truly is when the government does stuff 😔

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

"Marxism…tyrannical transitional government…

Tyrannical against who, Ben?

… common enemies…

With fascists, those targeted as enemies have no real power and are not a material threat. With anti-capitalists or Marxists, the enemy is those that have power and are not just a material threat but an existential one.

… bitterly oppose materialism…

… bitterly oppose individualism…

Oh honey… no… just no. Fascist don’t want individualism, they want everybody to be the same. That’s the whole point of treating anything that deviates from the “norm” as a de * enera * tion of society and must be destroyed or enshrined as lesser. Gays? Nope. Trans? Nope. Mixed race marriage? Nope. Mixed ethnic marriage? Nope. Born with a disability? Not acceptable in a fascist society.

There is nothing in Marxist theory that mirrors this quality of fascism. Opposing individual ownership of the means of production doesn’t deny an individual’s ownership of their identity.

…support of political violence…

You always have a right to defend yourself from people who want to kill you.

permalink
report
reply

Shit Reactionaries Say

!shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

Under new rules (Jan 2023), only this “Shit X Say” community is allowed along with Shit Ultras Say.

This community is for anything a reactionary would say that is shit. You know the drill. This includes:

  • Liberals
  • Fascists
  • Conservatives
  • Monarchists
  • Vaushites

etc etc.

Please do include the type of reactionary between brackets [] in your post title if you can.

All posts are marked NSFW (community is NSFW) because most people don’t want to see this on their lemmygrad timeline.

Community stats

  • 63

    Monthly active users

  • 2.2K

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments