55 points

I genuinely can’t take it anymore.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

Weird how they always put words like this into the mouths of tankies yet they never seem to muster a screenshot or a link to a comment.

Blue MAGA is wild. As soon as anyone dares breathe a word of criticism of a Democrat, immediately you’re a rabid Qanon Trump supporter in their eyes.

“I don’t support voting for Kamala, she does not represent my interests or my political beliefs.”
“Don’t you get it? You need to vote for Kamala to save democracy from Trump, who threatens to destroy it.”
“You mean the system where you vote for the candidate who represents your interests?”
“Yes.”

These progressives seem so disconnected that I wouldn’t be surprised if the irony in that is completely lost on them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Well they’ve defederated from anywhere with a dissenting opinion so they have to guess at our opinions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Except for ml. But they just instinctively down vote or ignore ml

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

I think it’s more that they live in a permanent state of exception since 2016 where they will excuse anything to stop orange man, and are insenced that you don’t too.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They’re literally still calling the Gazan genocide a ‘single-issue voter’ situation.

If Kamala suddenly announced she would eat every newborn child until the next election, would people still vote for her because they don’t want to be ‘single-issue voters’?

The line has to be drawn somewhere and quite frankly the line started long before genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

“I don’t support voting for Kamala, she does not represent my interests or my political beliefs.”

"Oh, so you’re saying you need a candidate that 100% aligns with your political beliefs? Sorry, sweaty, but the real world doesn’t work that way."

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

God I hate this response so much.

The Vote Blue No Matter Who crowd seems to think that it’s some purity test or a single-issue voter deal. Mostly it’s just projection (“I agree with Kamala on everything except her support for the genocide so therefore it’s the exact same in your case”/“I’m a single-issue voter and my single-issue is No Trumps”)

I’d be inclined to engage with this response when I come across it but I try to remember that I’m not in the business of coaching my ideological opponents in how to refine their tactics. This also goes for misogynists or queerphobes etc. as well.

I think the worst thing that we could do is to yell at progressives for being completely tone deaf and failing to listen to criticisms of the Dems because eventually some of the more savvy and self-aware supporters are going to take this lesson on board and their outreach will shift from “Hold your nose and vote, dammit!!”/“I know what’s best for you and I’m going to scold you for not allowing me to dictate what your political beliefs and best interests are!!” into something slicker and more convincing.

As much as it boils my piss on a personal level to constantly hear this kind of rhetoric, ultimately it’s to my benefit if they stick to their routine of attempting to whip the voterbase into submission because it’s going to make people more disaffected, which is when those people will start looking for alternatives and they’ll start seeing these issues as systemic.

Never interrupt your enemy while they’re making a mistake and all that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Where do “we” say to vote for republicans? Lmao

These people are deeply unserious

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Where do “we” say to vote for republicans? Lmao

In their minds being critical of right wing ideals is a vote for Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The Lemmy.world libs are so cooked they went from well-done to congratulations

They can’t form coherent thoughts, they summon a mystical enemy in their thought palace to fight against and cannot imagine someone thinking Red Genocide is also bad if Blue Genocide is bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

I stay as far the fuck from libs as possible at all times, so I genuinely get confused for a few seconds when they say “oh yeah!? You think Kamala would be a bad president?! Trump supporter! Look everyone, this guy loves Trump!”

I mean, at the risk, or rather with the intent, of being condescending… these people are fucking morons. They’re legitimately maybe one rung higher than some baying hog covered in his own fecal matter screaming at a the school administrators that “they better remove the cat litter from his child’s classroom or else!”

Take an undereducated, over-pampered population, add a dumpster full of insane little single issue distractions from the real shit (aka US “foreign policy” as well as all the terrible stateside shit these libs also don’t care about. Time to mass murder… deport…? Who knows which anymore… a bunch of migrants and asylum seekers!) shake it up for 50 years, scrub up off all that slimy gross “class consciousness” that may have accidentally existed at one point, never talk about class in real terms, never discuss what democracy should and could mean, just point at “oo brown Maslam man! Must kill!” “flings poo oo-oo! Trump! Oo! No Trump! Oo oo oo! No! No like!”

Americans are basically slightly higher thinking great apes. We are legitimately devolving day by day and any of these coping libs who think they aren’t just as fucking stupid and ape-brained as the hogs (too many animal comparisons…), well, I’d love for one of them to prove it some day. There’s probably some argument that some piece of shit could make that would be at least like a legitimate attempt at something beyond flinging poo at my head when I say “Who’s currently approving all the bombs and funding for bombs?” What happened to all the guys like Hitchens? I guess they’re all off whining about kitty litter just like the hogs. I keep proving myself more correct!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Agreed. It’s the end times for Empire and it will only deteriorate from here before it gets better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Spoiled children telling themselves stories about monsters

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Even better when it’s a reply to

both sides

Lemmy: bOth PArTiES ARE zIoniSt gEnociDERS!

permalink
report
parent
reply

All these people are convinced that Trump would be worse for Palestinians.

And maybe they’re right, maybe Trump will send in straight up death squads. Maybe he’ll build vans that pipe the exhaust into the cargo area and ship them to tel Aviv. Maybe he’ll start sending the Israelis Zyclon b.

But the fact remains. The last year has been the most deadly for Palestinians. Ever. More Palestinians have been killed in the last year than died during the formation of the state of Israel. More Palestinians have had their homes destroyed in the last year, then ever before in modern history.

At this point, saying Trump would be worse for Palestine is like saying that Himmler would have been worse for the Jews. Possibly technically correct, but also a poor attempted genocide denial.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

It’s very interesting how comfortable all the libs are with letting a fascist set the minimum standard for acceptable behavior

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

One said I wanted them dead simply for saying we’re allowing the current situation. They’re super fucked up

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Uwu I’m a small little flower who will wilt if you don’t soak me with blood

Uh guys I think maybe we shouldn’t feed people’s blood to this flower

and just let them die???

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

To be fair, you never said you didn’t want to impale them on a pike, a totally normal and rational thing to be worried about in the year 2024.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It’s fundamentally beside the point that the entire neoliberal edifice is demonstrably the worst thing for the Palestinians, and building an actual opposition does mean your opponent is liable to increase their aggression. A hypothetical Trump win is nothing but neoliberalism getting more aggressive as it is challenged (scratch a liberal, etc.). We cannot let fear of that turn us away from strategies that can actually solve things in the long term because all hands are too committed to bailing water instead of fixing the leak.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’ve said before that people who want America to get better have to be prepared to lose; we should be voting for third party (I’m a Jill Stein supporter myself) even if it means we lose this election. We may even lose the next one, but how many elections can we lose before people get sick of Republican victories and have zero choice but to vote third party? The Republican party itself is getting more unhinged because the DNC keeps supporting the most psychotic elements so they can tell dem voters you have to vote for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think we should minimise the dangers of the Republicans creating a one party state or there being a military coup. I mean, the Democrats won’t do anything to stop it, but we don’t have an electoral path in America at all. Maybe we did a couple of decades ago, not anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

When you’re Trump and you have to be more genocidal than Joe Biden

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

When the US sells weapons to Israel, the purpose is to ensure peace in the region by helping them hold a line of defense against military attacks from antagonistic countries; and in the case of Hamas, for the anti-terrorism operation of removing Hamas from power in Gaza, so that Palestinians can pursue self-determination free from terrorist rule.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

This person exists within a fictional space where America is just the heckin good guy and not a bloodthirsty empire hell bent on ever more blood

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

They can’t comprehend that a dem is letting it happen, only that it can somehow get worse with concentration camps or mass executions…which totally aren’t already happening

permalink
report
parent
reply

When that starts under the Kamala administration, they’ll find another excuse.

It’s kids in cages all over again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Yeah I got to that comment tree and blacked out for a bit, knew it was time to close the thread. Just unbelievably vile people

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

the purpose is to ensure peace in the region by helping them hold a line of defense against military attacks from antagonistic countries

“we created this artificial problem and now we need to protect this artificial problem from the problems it created”

in the case of Hamas, for the anti-terrorism operation of removing Hamas from power in Gaza, so that Palestinians can pursue self-determination free from terrorist rule

“Whatever Gazans are still left after the Gazan genocide SMO will be free to return to their unacceptable living conditions they had before Hamas, wherein they had unacceptable living conditions but were run by a resistance terro (okay I’m not calling them that even for a bit) organization. Then we can all celebrate their return to unacceptable living conditions because it’s not bothering Westerners any more”

permalink
report
parent
reply

A line from one of the early (and long) posts:

all the democrats are doing is supporting a country who aligns with US values

Well I’m glad they admit this much

permalink
report
reply
26 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

Which values

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Thats the problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

Let me be clear, I will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself, and I will always ensure Israel has the ability to defend itself, because the people of Israel must never again face the horror that a terrorist organization called Hamas caused on Oct. 7, including unspeakable sexual violence and the massacre of young people at a music festival.

-Kamala Harris

She can’t have it both ways. You can’t call out a genocide without using the word while at the same time you’re providing the weapons used to commit that genocide. Fucking ridiculous.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Also

the horror that a terrorist organization called Hamas caused on Oct. 7, including unspeakable sexual violence

Just repeating completely debunked, vile lies

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Well technically Hamas did cause it, by which I mean the Israelis committed unspeakable sexual violence against Palestinians as retaliation for existing. Wait. No. Uhhh…vote Harris 2024 or you’re literally a nazi (or something).

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments