Some nerds were doing that thing where 40k fans are like “OH NO SEXZ IS HERESY!” when it’s pretty definitively not and is basically one of the only things in 40k that isn’t heretical (as long as you’re not doing evil slannesh shit) and it got me thinking about repression of sex under “in bad country regimes”.

And a whoooooooooooooooooooooooooole fucking thing in 1984 was how liberating and humanizing it was that the author’s grungy middle aged self-insert was boning a 19 year old member of the Junior Anti-Sex League, and, like… America has several thousand different Junior Anti-Sex League and I’m not sure if the USSR ever had any? Like, yeah, maybe they did, but under capitalism Americans have literally convinced themselves they’ll go to hell if they see a tiddy and the English famously just hate joy. So what the fuck was Orwell trying to critique with his “Junior Anti-Sex League” in spoooooky Stalinist England?

The greatest irony about 1984 is the the bulk of the concepts in it like “memory holes”, “doublethink”, “room 101”, perpetual war ect. ect. were directly inspired from Orwell working in a British propaganda ministry during WW2. NOT THE SOVIET UNION. Orwell never even visited the Soviet Union and had an admiration for Hitler. Everything else in the book is literally just a rehash of tired old anti-communist memes from the 1930s.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Yeah 1984 is a great takedown of Churchill-era policy stretched to its extremes, which is why modern-day Britain and other capitalist countries fit the mold much better despite the anti-stalinist brainworms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Orwell […] had an admiration for Hitler

Source?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I should like to put it on record that I have never been able to dislike Hitler. Ever since he came to power—till then, like nearly everyone, I had been deceived into thinking that he did not matter—I have reflected that I would certainly kill him if I could get within reach of him, but that I could feel no personal animosity. The fact is that there is something deeply appealing about him. One feels it again when one sees his photographs—and I recommend especially the photograph at the beginning of Hurst and Blackett’s edition, which shows Hitler in his early Brownshirt days. It is a pathetic, dog-like face, the face of a man suffering under intolerable wrongs. In a rather more manly way it reproduces the expression of innumerable pictures of Christ crucified, and there is little doubt that that is how Hitler sees himself. The initial, personal cause of his grievance against the universe can only be guessed at; but at any rate the grievance is here. He is the martyr, the victim, Prometheus chained to the rock, the self-sacrificing hero who fights single-handed against impossible odds. If he were killing a mouse he would know how to make it seem like a dragon. One feels, as with Napoleon, that he is fighting against destiny, that he can’t win, and yet that he somehow deserves to. The attraction of such a pose is of course enormous; half the films that one sees turn upon some such theme.

Review of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I dunno, saying this is admiration is a mischaracterization. It is possible to find someone charismatic without admiring them. I mean, Orwell literally says he would kill Hitler if he had the chance - a sentiment I would not associate with an admirer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

you got your direct link but I highly recommend these as additional reading

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah Orwell was a bourgeois socialist

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

What’s the connection between Britain and Room 101? Well, I guess they probably did a fair amount of torture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Yeah, it’s pretty standard for MI5 and MI6. The Met does it too but not on the same level and especially not recently. Orwell was a colonial cop, he likely had first or second hand knowledge of British torture practices. Never put that together before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Orwell’s works make more sense as critiques of the US and that’s really funny to me.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Because liberals project all their flaws onto AES countries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Exactly, I read 1984 when I was still kind of a lib and I still thought “hey, this just sounds like the US!” lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I was a very young american conservative boy when I read it and I also was like “wow this is a critique of my country!” The book was one of many baby steps left for me and so I always find it extremely funny that it wasn’t supposed to do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Same, but with Animal Farm.

Now I’m a girl and I respect Stalin.

Sorry Orwell, you fucked up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Word. I hope there’s a hell so he has been able to watch his beloved Capitalism turn in to the hell he thought Stalin’s USSR was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

One of those Isekais, except it’s Orwell in a cyberpunk realizing “I fucked up I fucked up

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Orwell gets Isekai’d to modern Britain and thinks Stalin took over until someone finally shoves a history book in his face and the last shot is just him standing in the British rain staring bleakly at nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Whatever Orwell intended, I doubt very much that he intended 1984 to become the training manual it has become today.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

I don’t think there was much of anything other than “Stalin bad” going on in Orwell’s head when he wrote the book

permalink
report
reply
37 points

The guy was dying of tuberculosis in the months after it was published, so I don’t think he did any interviews about it.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

What a fucker. Denying me slop to mock him.

permalink
report
parent
reply