79 points

He’s absolutely right but I’m surprised he was able to sit through the movie considering they never show lady gagas feet

permalink
report
reply
28 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*

Hot take: Quentin Tarantino is the most overrated living director. His only good movies were Jackie Brown and Pulp Fiction. Everything else is a parody of itself (not in a good way) because he just takes scenes from other movies, mashes them together in a nonlinear story, then has everyone die because he doesn’t know how to write an ending to the incoherent plot he’s spliced together from better filmmakers.

I also suspect he was buddy-buddy with Harvey Weinstein but managed to slip under the radar because he avoids talking about his personal life.

permalink
report
reply

not really a hot take. he is a technically proficient slop merchant, makes some enjoyable movies but it’s laughable when he comes up in the conversation for best american director. Kubrick imo is basically untouchable in that department.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

he just takes scenes from other movies, mashes them together in a nonlinear story

What about his camera angles?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

it sure is quite something when you watch lady snowblood and realize that tarantino actually means “stealing” when he says “stealing” and that the originals always have a coolness to them tarantino couldn’t even dream of

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lady Snowblood

The Japanese manga by the guy who made Lone Wolf and cub

Tarantino fully stole it? You mean Kill Bill right ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I believe he was talking about the film from 1973, which Kill Bill heavily homages (or rips off, depending on how charitable you’re feeling) but shit, I never knew Lady Snowblood was originally a manga.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

“Reservoir dogs” is good, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He lives in Pissrael so

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

only thing i like about QT films is the dialogue, characters interact as normal human beings instead of comically stylized dialogue that every damn film does. his dialogue is a breath of fresh air, but damn do i despise the hyper violence that his films have.

permalink
report
parent
reply

quentin tarantino laughing his head off watching the worst film of the year in an entirely empty cinema in tel aviv is kind of a joker moment ig

permalink
report
reply
35 points

the worst film of the year

it can’t be worse than Borderlands

permalink
report
parent
reply

*second worst film of the year

permalink
report
parent
reply

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I saw the film last night and I enjoyed it. It was a bit long and could have done with better editing. They should have leaned harder into the musical elements. But it wasn’t the train wreck I’d been led to believe it was.

I recommend people see it and make their own minds up

permalink
report
reply

i rlly want to see it. i want it to be a proper musical but it sounds like it’s not :(

is it like the Barbie movie where it’s mostly just scenes that put more importance on the music and only one proper musical scene with singing and choreography?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I’d say there are maybe 8 to 10 musical numbers. They are all very short though and they are often interrupted. The movie is not a musical and anyone who says it is has clearly never seen a musical. About half of the numbers take place in some sort of liminal musical reality whilst the others take place directly where the characters are in the moment. I think they work very well which is why I wanted to see more of them. Sometimes it felt like they were scared to commit.

The rest of the film was good I thought, and I was never bored. I just wish they’d got the most out of the concept. It’s sad that this will probably be the end of this continuity as I think it could have continued (albeit in a different direction).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

About half of the numbers take place in some sort of liminal musical reality whilst the others take place directly where the characters are in the moment.

spoiler

That’s to show were Arthur begins dissociating and when the Joker instead of Arthur is fronting. Arthur and the Joker are headmates, they’re distinct personalities sharing one body, and the difference between song and dance with a subdued instrumental score in the normal set vs full musical number with change of scenery has a purpose in narrating what is going on with the system that is constituted by these two headmates (and possibly more, although their existence is only hinted at). I have just seen the movie and haven’t yet talked about it with a friend who’s both a massive musical and film nerd and also plural, so i’m gonna withhold judgement on how well they handled this topic, but it’s fairly obvious to anybody who’s spent some time with people with plural experiences that Arthur and the Joker are supposed to be different ego states within a system. It’s also expressly stated in the film even though it uses outdated language like “multiple personality” and Harvey Dent acts purposefully ignorant on what that means and how to recognize it, but it’s very clearly shown as well.

I also think this shows how ingrained ableism is with the chuds who criticize the movie - you can show the Joker as a “mentally ill loser in a society that doesn’t care” and they clap as long as they can hallucinate him as a fight club tough guy sigma, but when you go all in on what “mentally ill loser in a society that doesn’t care” means, how forensic psychiatry and legal institutions treat a neurodivergent person, when you realistically show what is going on inside their head, when you detail the complex trauma in their past, when you compellingly show their weakness and violation and pain, these hogs cannot handle it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

just watched it and still have no idea how to feel about it, but damn that was a bold swing and I gotta respect that. props to Mr. Hangover for making something that strange, experimental and risky for a major studio film. I agree, people should see the movie for themselves before judging it. a lot of people will jump on the hate train just because they see a low rotten tomatoes score and that’s sad

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I’m honestly not trying to be contrarian, but a lot of movies that catch massive hate online I actually end up liking. I only went to see this one because it was catching so much flak.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I notice that this narrative is getting passed around. There’s this idea that the movie was specifically made to piss off the people who liked the first one. I’ve also seen the weird term “Hollywood humiliation ritual” being thrown around again.

But why would a studio spend millions of dollars to do this? I just don’t get it.

It really has vibes of (((Hollywood))) attempting to humiliate a certain demographic (white males) by degrading their cultural iconography.

It just seems like a really chud way to frame the narrative. Wouldn’t they actually try to make money by producing the same slop for the same audience?

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Wouldn’t they actually try to make money by producing the same slop for the same audience?

There wasn’t really a “they” apparently. The studio basically gave the director free rein to do whatever he wants with the movie, given how successful the first one was

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

this idea that the movie was specifically made to piss off the people who liked the first one

yeah I don’t really buy this either. in fact the whole idea that Joker (2019) has some horrible fanbase is entirely socially constructed and not based in reality. the narrative that the movie was for “incels” was created before the film even came out and persists to this day, even though Arthur Fleck never actually did become a symbol that incels rallied around. the fact is that all sorts of people liked the movie for all sorts of reasons (and plenty of people disliked it too)

there’s no way Todd Phillips hates everyone who liked Joker. he probably likes it himself, having directed the film. he made Joker 2 for the people who enjoyed the first film as a character study of a broken man let down by the system and how alienation can lead to senseless violence. he very explicitly did not make it for the people who wanted Joker 2: Joker vs Batman, which is what Quentin is getting at here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I wanted Joker 2 to involve killing more rich yuppies

Who’s Batman?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Wasn’t Bob Kane Jewish??

permalink
report
parent
reply

Movies & TV

!movies@hexbear.net

Create post

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn’t tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here’s a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

Community stats

  • 52

    Monthly active users

  • 6.5K

    Posts

  • 75K

    Comments