87 points

“Homosexuality is bourgeoisie decadence”

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Being gay is extra revolutionary cuz it doesn’t create babies aka future wage slaves

permalink
report
parent
reply

artificial insemination wants to know your location

in addition, social reproduction involves way more than just mere b r e e d i n g. none of you are free from sin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

BE CRIME

DO GAY

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

hell yeah comrade 😎

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
40 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The question isn’t Left Unity; it’s determining which is the path forward for the party/movement, and do we work together in actions that some see as less than ideal (or outright hostile) from their perspectives, towards our common goals. Turning over Rosa to the government was, of course, a bad move; but with regards to the original split which facilitated the political conditions whereby that decision was made, did SPD have the political capital to resist the government’s push towards war with the German working class? Could they reasonably expect similar support from the other socialist parties of Europe such that the war would be aborted before it began? Or did they assess, as their governments did, that slowing down or stopping mobilization would only lead to another Franco-Prussian war where one side got to the battlefield first and won without a contest (and all the known consequences thereafter, like the Paris Commune)? We know with hindsight that such intransigence against the government may have stopped the war in its tracts, or at least maintained moderate unity within the left, but we have the benefit of hindsight.

Basically, when is an issue non-reconcilable? We’re human and prone to being biased and wrong, but even if both sides are “right” or internally consistent in their critique, it can still lead to splits. A bit of faith in our comrades, I’m sure, but too much faith and incomplete information can easily lead to an untimely death. I dunno, I got lots of questions and not a lot of answers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Should the revolutionaries just accepted the decision to vote for the budget?

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

and that’s why we need to show solidarity wi-

woah there pinko

:bruh:

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Sino-Soviet split

permalink
report
reply
68 points

The biggest :bruh: moment of the Sino-Soviet split was when China backed the US against Vietnam because they were big mad at the USSR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

supporting the khmer rouge to own the revisionists

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yup my bad. Though the real situation is even more confusing than what I thought lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments