This photo will give chapo an aneurysm.
And this one will break their brains.
Don’t google information about those relationships if you want to maintain your sanity.
Nah, they’re at war over land and resources. (Just don’t call it imperialism.)
Bruh China doesnt really have expansionist qualities, which is evidence i would need to see in order to classify it as colloqiually Imperialist (even though Lenin’s definition is x1000 more useful in today’s context).
Bringing territories such as Hong Kong back into the fold after they were stripped away by western colonial powers is not expansionism, in fact its quite the opposite: it is China starting to say “enough” and pushing back against the Imperial core’s neverending bloodthirsty desire to balkanize the PRC and buy up all the SOEs and Coops like hotcakes.
And border disputes are still extremely common outside of the imperial core, with factors ranging from shitty colonial border partitioning to less resources available to keep track of changes in parts of borders that are based on geographic features like rivers. Its not imperialist just cause military=spooky or whatever lib shite.
claiming china is good and socialist is basically believing in q. he has to get it on the inside so he can fulfill the prophecy of communism
I’ll venture that believing China is trying to achieve socialism is slightly more grounded in reality than believing a bunch of U.S. politicians have been secretly captured, executed, and replaced with clones.
China’s just a demsoc nation with ML characteristics. They aren’t some ultra pure leftist haven or anything. They’re pretty liberal, but at least they still have the mechanisms in place to massively mobilize their labor power to achieve public good. Criticisms that venture beyond that framing of them are usually in bad faith or poorly researched/sinophobic.
that reduction of poverty in china is one of the main contributors to the claims libs love to make that capitalism raised hundreds of millions from poverty right? Like it’s actually mostly just china?
if someone knows a source for this that’d be nice, I never actually checked into it just heard it on the internet so
As a massive :LIB: eral, i must note that holding your wine glass like Obama will lead to your wine getting warmer, whereas Xi’s method assures it stays at optimum drinking temperature.
Both: how dare he stand with that monster :angery:
Compared to the other pictures, he’s so close. I presume this shows how much they like and respect each other.
Xi Jinping is one of the strongest and most capable revolutionary leaders I have met in my life.
Socialism will definitively remain the only real hope of peace and survival of our species. This is precisely what the Communist Party and the people of the People’s Republic of China have irrefutably demonstrated. They demonstrated at the same time, as Cuba and other brotherly countries have shown, that each people must adapt their strategy and revolutionary objectives to the concrete conditions of their own country and that there are not two absolutely equal socialist revolutionary processes. From each of them, you can take the best experiences and learn from each of their most serious mistakes.
The Chinese process counted, in addition, with the contributions of great and brilliant political thinkers, who continued to develop and enrich the doctrines of socialism.
China has objectively become the most promising hope and the best example for all Third World countries. I do not hesitate to say that it is already the main engine of the world economy. In what time? In only 83 years after the foundation of its glorious Communist Party and 55 years after the founding of the People’s Republic of China. The relations between China and Cuba are today an example of transparency and peaceful collaboration between two nations that hold the ideals of socialism.
Wonder how the people who love Cuba and decry China as state capitalism parse this.
Folks, you know world leaders meet each other right? Tell me you know this.
