19 points

The name OpenTofu may sound silly

Someone should make a open source project about how to give good names to open source projects.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

EDIT: Informative comments below have convinced me that the license change is worth worrying about, and this fork is worth supporting.

The new license does not really affect the average person. Only companies offering terraform as a hosted service.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

Funny to be reading this in an open source community. For one, the fork’s license is open source while Terraform’s is not. The impact is mostly on businesses, but open source has always been for everyone - including business.

Furthermore, Terraform’s new license is subject to interpretation and dynamic. It’s so hazy and unclear that they created an FAQ website which is essentially a binding addendum to the license that can be updated anytime as Hashicorp pleases. Is your business competing with Hashicorp? Who knows, only Hashicorp can decide that.

Edit: Clarified phrasing

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I like open source because of how it affects ordinary individuals. I am not very concerned for businesses. In fact I’d prefer that businesses profitting from free software must profit share with the creators. It would ensure the longevity of the project.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What you’re describing is business source, not open source. Hashicorp chose to use open source and thus allow other companies to compete. Nobody forced them to, they could’ve just kept Terraform as closed or business source from the beginning. There’s nothing wrong with doing so, only if you pull a bait and switch like Hashicorp did does it become a problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The project controlled by only one entity can affect users in the future. Moving forward Hashicorp could do anything with the code or licensing and nobody could do anything about it. It is good that something is happening now, when there is still the chance to do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There are Alot of terraform users that either use a third party tool that the BSL would make legally impossible or benefit from features like locally encrypted state won’t get merged by hashicorp

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Good.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Why tho? I read the justification and the new license. Seems pretty okay to me. This is just going to fragment the community. So worse for everyone

permalink
report
reply

There are a number of companies that would be affected by the license change, and they are the largest driving force behind the fork. Hashicorp’s managed option just really sucks. There might be fragmentation, but I expect most people to switch to the project with more engineers, Linux foundation backing, and an actually open source license.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Love to see this and hate to see it at the same time.

I wonder how long interoperability will last or if they will immediately start forging a new path.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

All the functionality is in the providers, so breaking compatibility would be an awful idea

permalink
report
parent
reply

Open Source

!opensource@lemmy.ml

Create post

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

Community stats

  • 9

    Monthly active users

  • 968

    Posts

  • 4.1K

    Comments