4 points
*

Or, ya know, just learn another language. It’s not a big jump.

Edit: Godot 4.x is already slated to support a plethora of languages- including C#.

But even if the devs decided to not support C# for some reason: you’re really going to walk away from a game engine over not being able to use C#?

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Well I mean the biggest thing that would be the ultimate ideal would be anything that can maximize the ability to bring existing unity projects over to godot. IE minimal refactoring needed.

Big thing is not just getting people to start their new projects, but what about those who have spent 3+ years mastering their game, only to have the rug pulled out from under them when it was 80% of the way to release worthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s a single purpose language. Learning it will bring you no benefit other than using Godot.

Learn c# and you can do basicly anything you want.

Also gdscript is kinda ugly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

i just want enums and interfaces!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Gdscript has enums.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m going to say it (and eat the downvotes): Unity devs have become entitled, and kinda deserve the new Unity pricing structure.

Supporting more and more devices and functionality of c# on weirder and weirder runtimes. It is a mountain of dev work that Unity is paying for and subsidizing for your game. If there was an open source effort to make a unified c# runtime across all platforms that would be one thing, but it will always be front run by new features releasing to .NET so it will never exist.

Changing an existing agreement for pricing without any warning is gross. But something had to give eventually. I would have told you that 10 years ago.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

.net 7+ is an open source unified runtime.

Unity just needed to move to .net (previously .net core) to save a tonne of work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

From unity’s perspective it is a bunch of wasted work. Thats the issue - they threw a billion dollars at developing their proprietary c# runtime and not recouping the cost of investment. But they can’t wait around for Microsoft to make moves. And they probably don’t want to open source their runtime either out of fear that a free game engine using it will make the rounds.

Godot ultimately has the right approach: offer support through universal bindings to it’s underlying archetype and let devs decide what they want in their game’s stack. Everyone wins.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Godot

!godot@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the programming.dev Godot community!

This is a place where you can discuss about anything relating to the Godot game engine. Feel free to ask questions, post tutorials, show off your godot game, etc.

Make sure to follow the Godot CoC while chatting

We have a matrix room that can be used for chatting with other members of the community here

Links

Other Communities

Rules

  • Posts need to be in english
  • Posts with explicit content must be tagged with nsfw
  • We do not condone harassment inside the community as well as trolling or equivalent behaviour
  • Do not post illegal materials or post things encouraging actions such as pirating games

We have a four strike system in this community where you get warned the first time you break a rule, then given a week ban, then given a year ban, then a permanent ban. Certain actions may bypass this and go straight to permanent ban if severe enough and done with malicious intent

Wormhole

!roguelikedev@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official godot engine logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)
  • The banner is from Godot Design

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 246

    Posts

  • 190

    Comments