Avatar

SunRaIsAPosadist [none/use name]

SunRaIsAPosadist@hexbear.net
Joined
5 posts • 35 comments
Direct message

Well, the subcontinent is as close to a perfect concept of a non-continental world region that we can get.

permalink
report
reply

its okay dude everybody and their moma is a posadist these days

permalink
report
reply

in an interesting turn of events, the most notorious anticommunist on chapo chat shares anticonquista :xi-lib-tears:

permalink
report
reply

i could definitely see the post linking SwCC being nominated for some kind of derogatory award

permalink
report
parent
reply

no you did what we all shouldve

permalink
report
parent
reply

bruh i swear to god all the stuff people keep laying about :xi:

permalink
report
parent
reply

give me the standard privacy gear setup that a tech illiterate dipshit can easily setup. especially in the encryption department

permalink
report
reply

Worded like this, he is wrong, but from the sentiment in this thread there is something to it that people miss. From a position of having billionaires, capping their wealth is anti-marxist. it is idealism, the ideal that limiting their wealth is better for morale or something? The marxist move from a position of having billionaires, is to ask what happens if the wealth is capped. immediate capital flight, credit derating, currency collapse. the marxist road here, which i suspect the cpc is on to, is to inact much harder progressive taxation when the structure of the economy makes this cost beneficiary. right now, the structure is too centered on fdi attractibility in manufacturing.

as china moves to financialization and moves manufacturing overseas, this wealth shift is much easier to do, as they will be the ones possessing the relevant capital. if you guys as good baby communist took charge and capped wealth below the billion, you would see a financial collapse and secessionism in the regions with imperialist footholds and interest. the objection to this analysis is that you could say the marxist would never be in that position, so modern china cannot be marxist. but i would say this is from a place of disengagement with the dengist theory. So we dont criticize china for the idealist idocity of having billionaires, we continue to sift in the bipolar contradictions between lamenting the marketization shift/counterrevelution and the fact that what they do now is fucking working well…

permalink
report
reply

i guess the epistemic rift between the camps is that one part thinks that the power coupled to capital is real here, while the other thinks the fact that a ML party is in government makes the power of capital meaningless. Im in the former camp, I think the fact that some of the pigs are being fucking executed with impunity speaks volumes here

permalink
report
parent
reply