If you have any useful resource links please tag me in a comment with the link:

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to this if you can, thank you.

Links

Time/Map: https://time.is/Ukraine

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Ukraine/@49.1162725,31.7993839,7z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x40d1d9c154700e8f:0x1068488f64010!8m2!3d48.379433!4d31.1655799?hl=en

https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1B1PLMhbHmG1aJ2-QNxHY1TksI6HlNhqF&ll=48.60777942568106%2C36.4496511633501&z=7

Leftist discussion threads:

https://hexbear.net/post/177324

https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZedong/comments/t03foy/genzedong_russiaukraine_master_discussion_thread/

https://lemmygrad.ml/

Twitter military updaters:

https://nitter.42l.fr/RWApodcast

https://nitter.net/ASBMilitary :kitty-cri:

https://nitter.net/Militarylandnet

https://nitter.net/MihajlovicMike

https://nitter.net/KofmanMichael

https://nitter.net/TadeuszGiczan/status/1498673348183744518

https://www.youtube.com/c/DefensePoliticsAsia/videos

obvious disclaimers about taking all of them with tonnes of salt etc

Global South Perspective: https://nitter.net/kiranopal_/status/1498723206496145413

Better war/propaganda analysis:

https://www.understandingwar.org

https://www.moonofalabama.org/

News updates:

https://www.cgtn.com/special/UkraineCrisis.html

Live: https://www.cgtn.com/special/Live-update-Ukraine-Russia-border-crisis.html

YT/Video in Ukraine:

https://www.youtube.com/c/PatrickLancasterNewsToday/videos

https://www.youtube.com/c/RussellBentleyTe

Previous megathreads

First

Second

Third

Fourth

Fifth

Sixth

Seventh

Eighth

Ninth

Tenth

Eleventh

Twelfth

Thirteenth

Fourteenth

Fifteenth

Sixteenth

Seventeenth

Eighteenth

Nineteenth

Twentieth

!news@hexbear.net RSS Feed https://hexbear.net/feeds/c/news.xml

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
40 points

They’re invading because nato though. Nazis are just a side benefit. I don’t think they’d bother with them if not for nato, they would have waited until they got attacked first and then trounced them from a clearly defensive position. The nato issue however threatened to bring a nazi attack (years down the line) that could not be fought back against without assuming that their enemy was all of nato.

Thus, this shitshow.

Nato’s fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

not to defend the invasion but it the agitation in Donbas and the 8 year war might’ve been a player as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There is no need to use a hypothetical here. Putin said so many times already in his speeches and declaration of war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

NATO = Nazi

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nazi Arming and Training Organization

permalink
report
parent
reply

Of course, I didn’t say that was why. but like you said it was a component. A well funded, well trained, ideologically rabid festering boil of neo-nazis is much worse when they get tactical missiles. They already had a ton of western firepower. Nazis are the lowest scum on earth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Sure but I don’t think it’s strategically sound to support or be positive towards Russia for having done this. It would simply disconnect us from the masses. Even China seems to recognise this. Things might have been different had it been a defensive war for DPR/LPR, a “limited incursion” as Biden put it. But this is the whole shaboodle and comes off as an attack rather than a defence, especially with literally nobody knowing there was a nazi problem there to begin with and TO BE HONEST even MLs are only figuring out the scale of the problem now as the conflict goes on. Even those of us that have been watching Ukraine were really unaware of the size of the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I agree. I’m gonna light up for the side benefit, you do you.

permalink
report
parent
reply

No. Its not.

I grant you that a circumstance could probably be devised where such a thing would be based, but that is not what is happening now, this is no hypothetical

It is at best a pleasant byproduct of a terrible thing, and even then that’s a huge stretch because their existence in this conflict is mulching thousands of innocent civilians being used as meat shields, it’s also I’d say the international fascist movement’s Unite The Right moment

Its not going to go well, and they may appear largely dispersed and discredited if we’re lucky, but the bare fact is that thousands of radical reactionaries are traveling to ukraine and taking part in organized fighting. Yes, it’s a mess and yes a bunch will die

But its basically a mass fascist networking moment with the cherry on top of some of the most enthusiastic martyring from the western media

This is not good at all

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There will inevitably be another world war including an international fascist movement

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

yeah it sucks, and it’s horrible, no one is arguing that

You are focusing on the outcome of nearly a decade of the West organizing, funding, training, arming etc a fascist government at Russia’s border with an ideological predisposition toward war against Russia and whose choices were dictated by the US.

Where does the shelling of Donbas, Alley of Angels, banning Russian language, banning left-wing political parties, sharp rise in hate crimes verging on pogroms fit into your analysis?

The US is to blame for this, full stop. Those civilians being used as meat shields right now is the outcome of nearly a decade of funding and training very literal Neo-nazis by the US government and instigating conflict while planning full scale war using said investment. Maybe you think Russia jumped the gun, but my *opinion * is that Ukraine was a legitimate threat to Russia due to the culmination of factors, of which the ball had started rolling in 2014. You are choosing to ignore the attempts Russia has made to avoid this outcome. War/invasion or not, the result is a win-win for the west, and the losers were always going to be the Ukrainian civilians who neither wanted a western backed fascist government nor a Russian invasion.

Back to defending my shitposting that seems to have brought out so many detached hand-wringers: At some point, someone needs to shed blood to fight fascists. Whether or not that is the motivation of Russia/Putin, which it is not, it is happening.

Critical support for a US/NATO Neo-nazi army getting punched in the fucking nose for once, and I’m far from the only ML who arrived at this position, in fact I align nearly completely with most legitimate ML organizations who have made statements about this conflict.

I am not naive enough to believe these Neo-nazi scum will not resurface all over Europe.

I am wholly disappointed by the willingness of Westerners to support the current Ukrainian regime, and becoming irritated with leftists who hand-wring over the optics of ex. people thinking they support Putin if they so much as say “This invasion makes complete sense”, moral posturing notwithstanding, the invasion is the logical outcome of the US using it’s most worn out playbook for regime change and de-stabilization. Forming a detached position with enough ambiguity to avoid the criticism of your online comrades I’m sure feels great - coming up with the perfect take that pleases everyone, of which I have not heard a convincing position that takes into account all possible factors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Oligarchs cannot be trusted to denazify countries

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Azov is getting destroyed. You don’t need to trust anyone only look at the results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Very cool take, let’s invade anywhere with a right wing government, like how about Iran next?

:downbear:

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah it’s a terrible post, China should invade the US and start ww3, the US should go back in to Afghanistan, Israel should invade KSA are all kinda sort implied by it if I’m not feeling very charitable.

People are really reaching out to hand it to Russia on here for some reason and nobody on the Left really needs to do that. I would even say the DSA-IC statement was more than charitable to Russia, but I guess that’s not even good enough for some.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

A lot of people seem to think that Leftism is when you hate America and anyone who hates America is therefore cool and leftist. To the point that we have people cheering on war that’s just about bourgeoisie sending proles to kill each other for their own profits, just to own the West. Terminally online edgelord shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Except handing them a war is exactly what strengthens the far right

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’m not necessarily disagreeing but what exactly doesn’t strengthen the far right? If you economically weaken the country through sanctions, the hardship of the regular citizenry can be sabotaged towards nationalist ends. Ukrainian politics and leadership has been compromised by their presence in the form of fairly sizable paramilitary groups, and so it would be difficult for anybody to try and purge them without overwhelming internal force. Obviously, if much of eastern Europe (but particularly Ukraine) wasn’t so economically immiserated then there would be less incentive for Nazis to spring up, but the West sure wasn’t going to solve that and neither could Russia, really, especially due to the deterioration of relations between the two countries over the last decade or two.

So, to me at least, if you wanted to get rid of the Ukrainian Nazis then this seems like the only real option left for Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 198

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments