yes, it’s real.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
28 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

how many cis-hets are some kind of demi or agender or a little bit bi and just never think about it? never have to think about it?🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

If you called a man at birth and aren’t disphoric about it, there’s pretty compelling reasons to never even think about questioning it. Same is true if you’re mainly attracted to the opposite sex, just never really question the outliers, not worth the hassle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Or if you think a famous person is hot who is not the opposite, but not actually CARE about that fact, as you probably will never meet them, or attraction to someone who is non-binary.

I think as more non-traditional hot people gain greater visibility, the masses will also move along the kinsey scale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

right, we’re not primed to examine ourselves like that and if you fit in there’s no pressure to do so either. Doesn’t mean I experienced gender before I realized that I don’t experience gender. So I wonder about other peoples’ unexamined internal being.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Same is true if you’re mainly attracted to the opposite sex, just never really question the outliers

IME, this is incredibly true. Most of the people I had crushes on when I was young were girls, but then I’d be reading a book and there’d be a very erotic scene between two men and I’d be very intrigued and then the next day at school I’d be daydreaming about some girl, and to me this just felt like normal straight boy before. A decade+ later it’s obvious to me that primarily attracted to the opposite sex is in fact different from only attracted to the opposite sex. If I were a youth today would I recognize that already? I think maybe, some of it is introspection but a lot is a increased level of dialogue and understanding about these topics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’ve always kinda occupied a space between genders or at least blurred the line in several ways, and I’ve been forced by peers to think about it. I don’t identify as LGBT or think of myself as queer though; I feel like there are people who need and fit that term far more than I do.

Is demisexuality really in the same category as the rest? I thought it was either a style/mode of attraction, or something like being an “empath” where most people have it to some extent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

i was referring to demigender, but I figure demisexuality would be like the rest of the ace spectrum where a bunch of people are but never have the introspection or vocabulary, and could comfortably live their entire life fitting in well enough to avoid external pressure on their identity.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I personally do not experience sexual attraction at all until I know someone very well and have a pretty intense bond with them. I didn’t experience sexual attraction until I was about 23 and was really freaked out when it happened.

I think asexuality is pretty firmly under the umbrella of “queer” for me, and the dual attraction model helped me understand my sexuality for the first time in my life well after most people have had their sexual awakening. But I’m not sure how long that language has existed in its modern form. Not long, I don’t think. So the shared history is thinner.

permalink
report
parent
reply

A ton. The amount of times I’ve explained asexuality and had it met with, “I guess I’m a little asexual” is surprisingly high. That’s not even counting the people who are like, “well everyone’s like that”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I still maintain that most people are somewhere on the spectrum

permalink
report
parent
reply

I definitely would’ve considered myself cis indefinitely if not for the intense boost in trans visibility over the past couple decades

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments