You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

None of that is apartheid, though. Apartheid is stuff like not being able to buy land because it’s a white area.

permalink
report
parent
reply

“it’s bad but it’s not the exact word according to this very limited definition i have decided to impose” :very-intelligent:

glad you agree it’s bad. Have you ever heard of a “de facto” vs. “de jure” distinction. They have de facto apartheid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m trying to convince hardcore Israeli supporters and while I’m at it, neutrals. You can spout all the atrocities you like and they’ll just say “Hamas deserved it” or some other such nonsense. I need to draw explicit links between South African apartheid and Israeli apartheid, ideally using Israel’s own laws. Failing that, videos of hardcore Israelis saying shit like “fuck yeah we have apartheid and it’s great.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

You’re not going to convince hardcore israeli supporters. People like that typically hold political beliefs not because they’re true or false, but because of material interests. If it is in their perceived material interests to support Israel, they will, regardless of how bad they are. But read Norm Finkelstein and Ilan Pappe.

Here’s some heart-wrenching videos if you’re talking to people whose hearts can be wrenched.

A Palestinian man lists all the family members he lost when IDF bombed his home.

A 10 year old girl breaks down after air strikes destroyed her neighbors’ home

Israeli lynch mob and police breaking into a palestinian home in Haifa

IDF attacking and harrassing Palestinian medics trying to do their job, repeatedly dumping an injured man off of a stretcher

IDF disguising themselves among palestinian protesters, begin firing from inside the crowd

Jewish American Activist beaten by Israeli police for supporting Palestinians

Palestinian woman describes how she had her phone seized for filming IDF beating a child

Again. I stress “de facto” versus “de jure” here. Israel doesn’t need laws literally saying “we do apartheid!” They just need to impose something like apartheid through physical force. Legal-brained liberals only care about de jure oppression. If the state is capable of violently enforcing oppression without legal backing, it will! Bourgeois laws aren’t enforced on the ruling class! Constitutional protections don’t apply to oppressed groups!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m trying to convince hardcore Israeli supporters

You’re never going to convince them. They don’t want to be convinced and will willfully ignore evidence that is contrary to their position.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Look at a map.

The area controlled by the Palestinian state is divided into tiny Bantustans, surrounded by hostile Zionist occupation forces. It is like that now and it has been like that in every “peace plan” for the last few decades. Neither the Zionists nor their backers in the US have any intentions of ever letting Palestinians control enough of their own country to have a sovereign, functioning state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not just bantustans. Bantustans that look like swiss cheese, with Jewish settlements taking increasing amounts of the land every year.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@hexbear.net

Create post

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we’re all comrades here.

Community stats

  • 107

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 127K

    Comments