Why no, I’ve never done literally any research on this topic, but I’m pretty sure I’ve cracked this mystery.

Bonus lib wank

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
35 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

I’ve heard a theory that a secret service agent riding in the car behind him was hungover and accidentally pulled the trigger of his gun and hit Kennedy as the convoy went over a bump in the road which would be hilarious but seems incredibly unlikely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yes, this is what I believe

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The secret service are probably barred from drinking. But they probably do anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That one’s kind of the :grill: -pilled JFK conspiracy because it’s kinda nonpartisan, but at the same time it assumes that they just picked Lee Harvey Oswald at random as a patsy hours to minutes afterward.

permalink
report
parent
reply

This theory is usually combined with the official story as well. It’s not that the secret service just did it while going over a bump but he grabbed his gun in response to the original shot from Oswald and then also shot JFK.

This explains the magic bullet element of the case to a certain extent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Definitely possible that the “magic bullet” was a bodyguard with an itchy trigger finger.

But I don’t think that explains the bullet that actually hit Kennedy

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m pretty sure some podcast made it popular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Stuffing the bottom of the :pit: with Casper mattresses (please pretend it’s five years ago for the sake of this joke).

permalink
report
parent
reply

It was popularized by The Last Podcast on The Left. I know a few people who were convinced by it.

I tried to give a listen but they’re just too annoying. It’s also just an annoying theory / argument, you’re trying to tell me that it’s more likely to have been a freak accident than intentional?

permalink
report
parent
reply

It was first advanced in the book Mortal Error. To my mind it accepts the least illuminating evidence (forensic analysis and bullet trajectories) and discards the most illuminating evidence (the associations and biographies of the people surrounding the assassination, and the production of the Warren Report itself).

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments