Permanently Deleted
My wife is being induced today. We are having our 2nd baby.
Between anti natalist edge, people not knowing when it’s okay to be openly horny and lol random Shrek posting I truly feel like I’m back in Jr. High and Jr. High fucking sucked.
Starting to feel more and more like I’m intruding on the private chat of a highschool class
It’s been like that for a while here, I’ve given up on any serious political discussion since this place has settled into a “kids shitposting” zeitgeist
Yeah it’s really weird. I’m in my early 20s and the latest events have me feeling too old for this lol. Last time we did a survey 25% of people were under 18, soooo yeah…
:yea:
Yeah, I’m 30 and it feels like the general crowd has gotten younger and I’m feeling very too old for it.
hear me out tho !shrekland@hexbear.net
The antinatalist post made me realize the internet should just be permanently deleted because there’s too many people who find out about stupid philosophies and end up thinking “you know I think it would be best if we just killed everything”
Except antinatalism isn’t a stupid philosophy, literally any argument you could have against it, there’s a logical, reasonable counter. I’m not here to convince you otherwise, I don’t give a fuck if you like it or not, but it ain’t stupid.
It has nothing to do with sterilization. People can decide to breed if they want, no one is forcing ppl to stop breeding. What antinatalists are saying is that if you bring life into this world, there will ALWAYS be some degree of suffering, then the philosophy goes on to discuss whether suffering is worth procreation. It would help if y’all actually took time to research this from an antinatalist perspective.
I’d rather adopt a kid and try to give them the best life they could have, instead of bringing life into this world. It’s all about reducing and ending suffering. I’m not motivated by some banal shit like passing on my genes or that I need to keep life going to find some meaning in this shit world.
Anti-Natalism but it’s about challenging the :LIB:eralism of Contrapoints