I read about this the other day, he’s explicitly trying to, and I quote, “hone their pick to Republican preference.” Why, you may ask, would a democrat try to hone the supreme court pick to the other party’s preference? Is it because that party controls one of the houses and has veto power? Is it because the republicans can block it like the did with Garland? No and no, it’s because he heard a talking head on CNN say that American’s don’t want another supreme court battle. Not citing a poll, just sayin’.

First off, that’s why the dems want to lose so bad, why Pelosi wants “a strong republican party.” They know that it’s looks super shitty to preemptively fold on issues because the TV said politics was annoying. But secondly, I am so fucking sick of this long-standing trope in liberal politics where political disagreement is regarded as immature. You see it in every single dem primary debate, there will be some point where two candidates will disagree and go back and forth, then another (I think it was Pete this last time) will get a fucking applause break by saying something like “This is what the american people are tired of, this pointless bickering.” Hate…all of my hate

Damn, sounds like the perfect choice for the Dems.

With those qualifications she sounds like a perfect fit for the dems

All the liberals had to do was hold the line, “If you vote for us every time for 40 years you’ll get nothing, but in 40 years the conservative judges will die and then you might get something.” They couldn’t even do that.