3 points

regretable but inevitable with the chauvanism the soviet union kept engaging in and the ideological instability khrushchev caused with his anti-stalin campaign which would give room for capitalist roaders to take over and destroy the party from within. its sad people will always blame china for not abandoning its five principles of peaceful coexistence and making itself subsurvient to the soviet union while it moved to surround china and also refuse to help north korea. maybe one day they’ll open their eyes. I myself will never forgive the soviet union for agreeing to partition palestine, being the first country to recognize the zionist occupation, stalin being best buddies with david ben-gurion, and having czechoslovakia send them arms

permalink
report
reply

against it

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I think that might be the other way around, Khruschev might have sinked both nations

Those texts from Mao somewhat illustrates my concerns https://youtu.be/w-e2veazbKc?si=Gnke24cs0zbVAudh

https://youtu.be/5KCP3Jahe6M?si=NSlQ3lTwJnx7aAOp

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I found YouTube links in your comment. Here are links to the same videos on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

Link 1:

Link 2:

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*

It’s very unfortunate and feels like it should’ve been avoidable, especially since China ended up following the USSR’s path of economic reforms and peaceful coexistence with the West. Mao had some pretty bad takes like on nuclear war, funding the Khmer Rouge, Lysenkoism, and the whole “continuous revolution” thing. But of course a lot of the blame also goes to Khrushchev. Imo the right line is that leaders like Stalin and Mao were necessary to safeguard the revolution and eliminate the horrible, unimaginable conditions that the people lived under before they came to power - but once that job is done, then the material conditions call for a more relaxed approach. But unfortunately, neither side saw it that way, and the result was irreparable damage to relations, which broke down trade and harmed lots of people from both countries. Nowadays, China plays nice abroad without caring much about the ideology of their trade partners, and it seems very stupid all around that two Marxist states couldn’t work things out.

It’s kind of a funny psychological phenomenon that people sometimes get more mad at people who broadly share their worldview but disagree about one thing, than they do at people who just don’t share their their worldview at all. I think to an extent the split is attributable to that, but I’m not really an expert on it.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

But why side with the USA against the USSR though? That was a betrayal to the global proletariat.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Thoughts on ...?

!thoughts_on@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

A community to ask comrade lemmygraders their thoughts on anything.

The format of post titles should be: “Thoughts on” + whatever you want to ask + “?”

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 161

    Posts

  • 1.2K

    Comments