Good article by a Pakistani Socialist, which talked about Imran Khan signing with IMF, social conservatism, repression of trade union and farmer groups and military backing to stay in power.

46 points

Big disappointment for the 0% that thought that Pakistan had a principled socialist as a PM.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Baffling why people are dismissing this article. Lot of what’s being said is backed up by what other leftists in Pakistan have been saying for years about IK, from what I’ve read on the subject.

The biggest issue is where does Pakistan go from here? The army remains second to none, and that isn’t set to change anytime soon. IK was not good, but Pakistan has had much worse leaders.

Without a concrete agenda for challenging neoliberalism and for redistribution of wealth, talk of foreign conspiracies can lead to delusional thinking manufactured by socially regressive forces in order to avoid discussions on internal contradictions.

This is a salient point in a vacuum, but it would seem to me that foreign conspiracies are pretty much part and parcel of what has largely been a unipolar US hegemony since the USSR fell. I think those would also be part of the internal contradictions of any country, especially one that is of strategic interest to the US. Maybe three letter agencies didn’t get involved in this instance, but the US has clearly been unhappy with IK for some time now. Maybe I’m mistaken, but this seems idealistic to me.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

The author seems fine. The topics of his other articles are good, his organization seems fine. The article seems fine. I don’t think I’ve seen evidence that the allegation is true outside of the email.

This post is declared good.

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

no shade to the author but I really do not trust Jacobin’s foreign policy so I’m going to take this with a grain of salt

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Ya, I trust them about as much as the NYT at this point

Which is to say not at all

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

yep interesting headline, and I was gonna click to have a read, but once saw it’s jacobin, I said nah

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Jacobin have both good and bad articles depending on the writers and just dismissing it out of hand is ehh :shrug-outta-hecks:

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s like the WSWS, you know the topics that they’ll have bad takes on, and you can get some good analysis from them without having to throw your monitor across the room.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Jacobin would call Nicaragua imperialist

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@hexbear.net

Create post

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we’re all comrades here.

Community stats

  • 107

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 127K

    Comments