Good article by a Pakistani Socialist, which talked about Imran Khan signing with IMF, social conservatism, repression of trade union and farmer groups and military backing to stay in power.

16 points
*

Damn, well I guess if Jacobin says I shouldn’t sympathize with a brown democratically elected leader being ousted by the US because they don’t pass purity tests…

permalink
report
reply
23 points

The writer is a brown, on the ground Pakistani socialist, so it’s better to just see what they have to say instead of hand-wave it away as being from Jacobin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I’ve completely given up on anything published by any western media outlet, including all the supposedly “leftist” ones, and I do not give a single shit about who wrote it

Yes, they do occasionally report the truth, but who the fuck cares

They all serve the reaction

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Sure, Jacobin should be treated as an unreliable source and you should verify their shit before you believe it, but this r/politics-esque attitude of “no I didn’t read the article, now here’s my opinion on it” just causes conflict. If a comrade shares an article in good faith, it’s usually worth reading it so that you can then respond in good faith. If an article is bad, tell them why it’s bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’m brown, I read the article, I give you all permission to dunk on it, it’s trash

Unfortunately, the forces of the status quo in Pakistan that have replaced Khan represent a moribund social structure that continues to exploit the public, suspending politics between uninspiring democrats and an insurgent authoritarianism.

The author buries the actual fucking point most people have made concerning this coup to instead construct a phantom group of “neoliberal populist anti-imperialist nationalists” who leftists somewhere apparently sympathize with

The rest of the article is made up of tedious truisms like “Anti-imperialism must remain at the core of progressive politics to reimagine a strong global left” (thank you captain obvious) and wikipedia grade history paragraphs of Khan (you won’t believe it)…doing capitalism! dun dun dun :shocked-pikachu:

Triangulating, liberal comforting hack work you could have gotten out of a graduate pol-sci student, typical Jacobin

permalink
report
parent
reply

Just throwing things but i am pretty sure that the " “neoliberal populist anti-imperialist nationalists” who leftists somewhere apparently sympathize with" is supposed to mean Assad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

There are brown, on the ground Pakistani socialists who support Khan, Jacobin chooses to print what serves their line :chomsky-yes-honey:

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean the current PM is also democratically elected. If you’re aware of parliamentary system, Imran khan was running a “minority govt”, his party didn’t get full majority so a couple of small parties supported him to form govt. Now those parties shifted their support to Shahbaz Sharif

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

no shade to the author but I really do not trust Jacobin’s foreign policy so I’m going to take this with a grain of salt

permalink
report
reply
8 points

yep interesting headline, and I was gonna click to have a read, but once saw it’s jacobin, I said nah

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Jacobin have both good and bad articles depending on the writers and just dismissing it out of hand is ehh :shrug-outta-hecks:

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s like the WSWS, you know the topics that they’ll have bad takes on, and you can get some good analysis from them without having to throw your monitor across the room.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ya, I trust them about as much as the NYT at this point

Which is to say not at all

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Jacobin would call Nicaragua imperialist

permalink
report
reply
25 points

The author seems fine. The topics of his other articles are good, his organization seems fine. The article seems fine. I don’t think I’ve seen evidence that the allegation is true outside of the email.

This post is declared good.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Baffling why people are dismissing this article. Lot of what’s being said is backed up by what other leftists in Pakistan have been saying for years about IK, from what I’ve read on the subject.

The biggest issue is where does Pakistan go from here? The army remains second to none, and that isn’t set to change anytime soon. IK was not good, but Pakistan has had much worse leaders.

Without a concrete agenda for challenging neoliberalism and for redistribution of wealth, talk of foreign conspiracies can lead to delusional thinking manufactured by socially regressive forces in order to avoid discussions on internal contradictions.

This is a salient point in a vacuum, but it would seem to me that foreign conspiracies are pretty much part and parcel of what has largely been a unipolar US hegemony since the USSR fell. I think those would also be part of the internal contradictions of any country, especially one that is of strategic interest to the US. Maybe three letter agencies didn’t get involved in this instance, but the US has clearly been unhappy with IK for some time now. Maybe I’m mistaken, but this seems idealistic to me.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@hexbear.net

Create post

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we’re all comrades here.

Community stats

  • 107

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 127K

    Comments