from our friends at WaPo
I somewhat understand part of this sentiment actually. LGBT rights should be “unalienable” and shouldn’t be up for debate. The right to interracial marriage shouldn’t have been up for debate
However they instantly go lib and say this isn’t how democracy works
The declaration of these unalienable rights was written by slave owners.
The serpents court decided ”that the criminalization of interracial sex did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because whites and non-whites were punished in equal measure for the offense of engaging in interracial sex” in 1883 which remained the standard for over 60 years.
I think some libs just try so hard to imagine a world without any conflict they believe they are actually in it.
I AM GOING TO BECOME THE FUCKING JOKER
Literally just saying “their small brain-pans dont understand democracy” get bent fascist fucks
Rights? Subject to a vote? Pshaw. Rights come from old men in robes, preferably slave owners. Or maybe a king.