“hey, i’ve got a great idea for the service, that will reduce the women/men ratio on the platform, and will make the remaining men the most annoying, undatable kind possible”

permalink
report
reply

also: what’s the crypto value-add? could you not put money in escrow before blockchain?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

To be fair, that will enhance the value of other dating sites.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

finally, now i can get a receipt that says women don’t want to have sex with me

permalink
report
reply
13 points

:curry-space:

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

(enlightened rational specimen voice) the problem with dating is that there aren’t enough perverts!

permalink
report
reply

oh yeah gonna mine some fuckcoin with the wife this weekend

permalink
report
reply

Bring a friend in case she requires 2FA

permalink
report
parent
reply
Bitloins :kelly:

I’ll be charitable and assume the “solution” is multisig escrow so that the “dating service” or whatever doesn’t actually get revenues for membership until they make a match or something? The allusion to a specific token makes me think not though.

permalink
report
reply

I guess I was almost right but of course underestimated the misogyny: https://nitter.snopyta.org/cyprianous/status/1605697957013213185

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

The most desirable men, who effectively are able to acquire a “harem”

Anime and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

permalink
report
parent
reply

you don’t aquire a harem through being charming you do it through human traficking and violent misogeny

and also shouldn’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

/har·em / noun - ‘group of one or more women who aren’t completely repulsed to have a conversation with you’

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Who the fuck are these people looking at that have harems, anyway? Do they just consider anyone having casual sex with multiple women over time harem-building?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The optimum strategy for men is the “spam approach.” There’s no cost to attempt to communicate/match with as many women as possible.

This necessarily means that women have what appears to be far more interest than they actually have and can be overwhelmed with contacts.

So give people maybe 3 likes per day? Once again, crypto offers nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

this isnt true. dating apps have elo rating systems and if you swipe right on a lot of people but they dont swipe right on you, ur ranking goes down and you will be shown accounts with lower rankings. women on these apps are overwhelmed by contacts bc the apps are something like 80% men.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the_dunk_tank

!the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create post

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 432K

    Comments