Bitloins :kelly:
I’ll be charitable and assume the “solution” is multisig escrow so that the “dating service” or whatever doesn’t actually get revenues for membership until they make a match or something? The allusion to a specific token makes me think not though.
I guess I was almost right but of course underestimated the misogyny: https://nitter.snopyta.org/cyprianous/status/1605697957013213185
The most desirable men, who effectively are able to acquire a “harem”
Anime and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
you don’t aquire a harem through being charming you do it through human traficking and violent misogeny
and also shouldn’t
The optimum strategy for men is the “spam approach.” There’s no cost to attempt to communicate/match with as many women as possible.
This necessarily means that women have what appears to be far more interest than they actually have and can be overwhelmed with contacts.
So give people maybe 3 likes per day? Once again, crypto offers nothing.
this isnt true. dating apps have elo rating systems and if you swipe right on a lot of people but they dont swipe right on you, ur ranking goes down and you will be shown accounts with lower rankings. women on these apps are overwhelmed by contacts bc the apps are something like 80% men.
Baby, our love ain’t real unless it’s listed on the blockchain.
“hey, i’ve got a great idea for the service, that will reduce the women/men ratio on the platform, and will make the remaining men the most annoying, undatable kind possible”
:sus-lovecraft:
