9 points

Ohio really be jerking off to music

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

oregon makes sense for furry, didn’t know that about indiana though

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Utah’s top porn search being “Mormon”, might be the funniest thing on there.

permalink
report
reply

Hey SC, how’s it going?

GILF

:yea:

permalink
report
reply

Hey at least it’s not race fetishism or incest…

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

:wholesome:

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

:skwisgaar-skwigelf:

permalink
report
parent
reply

Am I the only one really grossed out by these kind of lists?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

:volcel-kamala:

permalink
report
parent
reply

If this is the stuff on the front page of the world’s biggest porn website, unironically yes.

Is this how volcel becomes a kink? Oh shit oh fuck, I’ve messed it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Definitely not

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah it just seems really perverse in all of the worst ways.

If this is what’s popular, no wonder dating is screwed up these days. Imagine being anything other than a plain dude and having to worry if you’re being fetishised by some pervert.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I don’t think this list means literally everybody that’s on pornhub is hyperfocused on weird fetishes.

Considering how diverse this list is I don’t really think it means much unless you assume sex cultures differ wildly between US states, I think most people just put in the search bar what they’re in the mood for that day, it doesn’t mean it’s literally the only thing they can get off to.

permalink
report
parent
reply

i would imagine there are a lot of people without a specific fetish or interest that just click around. like, are there really an appreciable amount of people going to a major porn site, ignoring the front page entirely, and typing “sex” in the search? it’s not like google where there’s just a search bar with these sites. most of every page is clickable “popular/mainstream” content.

so this type of analysis ignores that (probably most common) type of user and focuses only on people who are searching for something specific, which is probably going to be something weirdly specific.

permalink
report
parent
reply

For your sanity, I’ll note that they’re probably using the number of searches rather than the number of unique users searching each term. So presumably, the top terms as well as the bulk of content produced skew heavily toward “power users” to put it mildly

Also, non-power users might be more likely to save the content they like instead of searching for it each time, since it’s harder to find than what the power users are searching for

permalink
report
parent
reply