I was sure it was going to be professional genocide ghoul Shapiro. Color me surprised.

91 points
*

Thank fucking god honestly. Shapiro pick would have been a nightmare regardless of your thoughts on voting. An arch-zionist who volunteered for the IOF one assassination away from the presidency.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

Also literally helped cover up a Murder and had sexual harassment allegations in his office. I wouldn’t be surprised if that played more of a role than the zionism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

I mean let’s be honest the zionism didn’t play a role

permalink
report
parent
reply

the zionism was a positive in the regime’s eyes

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah that’s exactly why I was sure they would pick him. Astonishing to see the Dems not go with the worst, dumbest option available to try to appeal to the worst people in the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

It’s so funny that they are going to handily beat trump by simply not making the exact worst decision possible at every turn (like second or third worst maybe idk).

Such a contrast from picking Clinton and Biden twice.

permalink
report
parent
reply

He’s an astonishingly bad and unpopular candidate, and losing to him once (plus almost losing again) required Mission Impossible levels of threading the bad planning and performance needles. It would be super funny if they just blew him out of the water by making a few choices that weren’t the worst available options and calling him weird a few times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Yeah, Walz is far from a lefty candidate, but given the track record of the dems, I thought when it came down to him and Shapiro, they would make the same bad choice they’ve made basically my entire life. Not a victory by any stretch, but at least not the worst option for a change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

Look it’s probably the best outcome possible for the Dems.

As communists the result of this election simply alters the nature of the fight, not the difficulty, but this makes all our enemies mad and may wrest some small concessions so it’s fun. Let’s just enjoy the moment.

permalink
report
reply

I’m celebrating that Shapiro did not get the nod. That’s a win in my book.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I’d rather struggle against ruling class representatives who are willing to negotiate to some extent, instead of ones who want to throw us all out of helicopters. I haven’t been this close to engaging in (national) electoral politics since Bernie. Which means the controlled opposition is doing its job very well, kudos

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

Hmm, they’re actually trying to win and it seems like Trump is kinda floundering currently. 3 months left but it’s looking up for Kamala.

permalink
report
reply
56 points
*

Trump’s campaign has the same vibe currently as an AI-generated crypto meme. Not sure how else to describe it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Bro Trump got on aiden ross’s stream He is cooked 💀

permalink
report
parent
reply

Adding Ross fans are not old enough to vote lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

They call him Adding Ross because his demo has yet to reach the multiplication and division section of their math course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

I think this might actually be good news. Not because Waltz is better than Shapiro electorally (although he is, by a lot) because I’m not exactly super invested in Kamala winning, but I have a glimmer of hope this might be a positive signal for the direction of her foreign policy. Netanyahu is trying to start a regional war and to lock any future US administration into that war. Picking the turbo-Zionist Shapiro would have been an unmistakable signal that a future Harris administration would follow Netanyahu into that war. Snubbing him for a more moderate/progressive pick potentially signals a willingness to break from Israeli positions.

And again, not that I’m rooting super hard for Kamala, but it is notable to see democrats not picking the option that divides their base and puts them on the defensive when everything was going their way. Shapiro has multiple glaring liabilities- comparing anti-genocide protesters to the KKK, supporting Charter schools, possibly covering up the murder of his major donor’s fiance- and if they picked him, they would have had to scold their voters into shutting up while Republicans gleefully pounced on him. I’m so used to democrats shooting themselves in the foot and going into scold-mode that it’s actually sort of noteworthy when they don’t.

permalink
report
reply

Yeah, I agree entirely. It is at least a sign that she may have a real threshold when it comes to support for Israel, which is probably about the best we can hope for from the Democrats. Picking Shapiro would have been a signal that she is all in on the genocide, so it’s at least worth celebrating that she went another way. I don’t really expect this to turn into meaningful support for Palestine, but it does at least represent a step back from total bloodthirsty support of Israel, which is what we’ve gotten with Biden (and which is increasingly unpopular with the Democratic voters). As you said, maybe it at least means she wouldn’t fall in line with Israel attempting to subjugate an entire region of the planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply

If she picked Shapiro, I would have interpreted it as a genuine middle finger to myself and everyone else who was opposed to genocide.

This pic, is more like patting what’s on the head and telling us that she hears and sees us. While she continues the genocide.

So like, it’s better than the alternative, but I’m still waiting for her to do something.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not holding my breath on that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

the right might attack the Harris campaign from a pro-zion position and it’ll create a bit of an interesting situation, we’ll see what they do with that. It gives them an escape hatch, where the Dems can turn on netanyahu and lump him with the right wing

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There’s not really any precedent for the Dems to actually make that big of a positive turn. Why would they turn around on Israel? The support of Israel as an imperialist project is especially critical with the advent of BRICS and multipolarity. It would drastically accelerate the imperial decline if they stopped paying their mercenaries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I don’t think they will either, I just think it’ll be interesting when the right does that attack. It’ll mess up their vibes based campaign fairly hard, so they’ll likely ignore it entirely and try to coast on the current good feelings.

I was hypothesizing like the way to do it and save face, not saying they’ll actually stop supporting Israel lol. With Biden there wasn’t even a way to imagine that, with this I can see the ability is there, which will make the Dems at large even more culpable when they dont

permalink
report
parent
reply

Objectively the best that can happen for the dems is Trump wins. They resurge in the typical midterm comeback, render Trump a lame duck for two years and have an open shot in 2028 for Obama 2.0, which they would fuck up anyways. Which is why I say we really wont have another real shot until 2036/2040 when boomercide is at it’s peak, but then they will thrust us into WW3 to deny us yet again a peace dividend.

God I want out so bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply

deep condolences to comrade @Frank@hexbear.net who has lived under the the Walz regime

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I will allow that he is one of the least bad dems.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the lowest of the bars

permalink
report
parent
reply

electoralism

!electoralism@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn’t just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember…we’re all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

Community stats

  • 39

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 33K

    Comments