for anyone who wasn’t around for the dustup when r/ContraPoints declared war on the old subreddit, here’s a sample of the moderation team’s style:
I’ve asked you
TWO
Extremely clear questions.
ONE:
CAN YOU ABIDE BY OUR COMMUNITY’S RULES?
and
TWO:
WERE YOU TRYING TO CALL ME A LIAR?
These are questions I asked YOU.
You can answer them – or not.
And you can participate here.
Or not.
The moderation team of /r/ContraPoints is the moderation team of /r/ContraPoints.
YOU are NOT on it.
Before 35 minutes ago, you’d never participated in our community.
How we run our community is our business, and the business of the people who participate here in good faith.
We don’t allow disrespect; We don’t allow verbal or emotional abuse; We don’t allow people to brigade our subreddit and post off-topic posts and metadrama.
What YOU think you know about our moderation team is informed solely by third-hand hearsay and screenshots released by someone abusing their position, edited and therefore cherry picked to support a narrative.
That narrative is abusive.
It will not be allowed.
No one will be allowed to come here and back-seat run our subreddit, or light torches and brandish pitchforks.
So now,
THREE Questions:
The first two still must be answered,
and
AM I PERFECTLY CLEAR THAT YOU ARE NOT A MODERATOR OF THIS SUBREDDIT?
The mod got pissy with me for using the “Kehoe Paradigm” instead of the “precautionary principle.” I corrected her and said I was applying the dominance principle and she banned me. Lol dork got out-dorked and hit the eject button
Ma’am, this is a Wendy’s
I’m guessing this sort of vitriolic response is an aggressive defensive impulse developed against sealioning by actual reactionary assholes (which reddit is full of) - it isn’t the job of the oppressed to waste their own time to educate the oppressor, after all. Just like a time-wasting or concern-trolling sealion question, this post simultaneously shifts the burden of evidence away from the questioner and imposes a seemingly arbitrary standard of evidence. While opponents of western imperialism might take as given that Adrian Zenz isn’t necessarily credible, to a western liberal this looks like bad-faith goalpost-shifting in service of genocide denial.
I wasn’t attempting to excuse the Contrapoints mod’s assumptions of bad faith. I was trying to explain why this obviously good-faith question was attacked as if it were bad faith trolling. (Also, when I invoked the phrase “it’s not the job of the oppressed to educate the oppressor”, it was an attempted tongue-in-cheek illustration of the liberal mod’s defensiveness against actual bad faith sealioning, misapplied to this situtation, which reads as serious because the delivery was extremely deadpan.)
reddit and breadtube are both worthless shitholes so guess what happens when they’re combined?
no no boy shit but in reverse
